Re: [PATCH v2] mtd: parsers: bcm63xx: simplify CFE detection

[Álvaro Fernández Rojas <noltari@xxxxxxxxx>]

Hi Florian,

> El 11 jun 2020, a las 17:42, Florian Fainelli <f.fainelli@xxxxxxxxx> escribió:
> 
> 
> 
> On 6/11/2020 8:16 AM, Álvaro Fernández Rojas wrote:
>> Hi Miquel,
>> 
>>> El 11 jun 2020, a las 9:55, Miquel Raynal <miquel.raynal@xxxxxxxxxxx> escribió:
>>> 
>>> Hi Álvaro,
>>> 
>>> Álvaro Fernández Rojas <noltari@xxxxxxxxx> wrote on Mon,  8 Jun 2020
>>> 18:06:49 +0200:
>>> 
>>>> Instead of trying to parse CFE version string, which is customized by some
>>>> vendors, let's just check that "CFE1" was passed on argument 3.
>>>> 
>>>> Signed-off-by: Álvaro Fernández Rojas <noltari@xxxxxxxxx>
>>>> Signed-off-by: Jonas Gorski <jonas.gorski@xxxxxxxxx>
>>>> ---
>>>> v2: use CFE_EPTSEAL definition and avoid using an additional funtion.
>>>> 
>>>> drivers/mtd/parsers/bcm63xxpart.c | 29 ++++-------------------------
>>>> 1 file changed, 4 insertions(+), 25 deletions(-)
>>>> 
>>>> diff --git a/drivers/mtd/parsers/bcm63xxpart.c b/drivers/mtd/parsers/bcm63xxpart.c
>>>> index 78f90c6c18fd..493a75b2f266 100644
>>>> --- a/drivers/mtd/parsers/bcm63xxpart.c
>>>> +++ b/drivers/mtd/parsers/bcm63xxpart.c
>>>> @@ -22,6 +22,9 @@
>>>> #include <linux/mtd/partitions.h>
>>>> #include <linux/of.h>
>>>> 
>>>> +#include <asm/bootinfo.h>
>>>> +#include <asm/fw/cfe/cfe_api.h>
>>> 
>>> Are you sure both includes are needed?
>> 
>> asm/bootinfo.h is needed for fw_arg3 and asm/fw/cfe/cfe_api.h is needed for CFE_EPTSEAL.
>> 
>>> 
>>> I don't think it is a good habit to include asm/ headers, are you sure
>>> there is not another header doing it just fine?
>> 
>> Both are needed unless you want to add another definition of CFE_EPTSEAL value.
>> There are currently two CFE magic definitions, the one in asm/fw/cfe/cfe_api.h and another one in bcm47xxpart.c:
>> https://github.com/torvalds/linux/blob/master/arch/mips/include/asm/fw/cfe/cfe_api.h#L28
>> https://github.com/torvalds/linux/blob/master/drivers/mtd/parsers/bcm47xxpart.c#L33
> 
> The caveat with that approach is that this reduces the compilation
> surface to MIPS and BMIPS_GENERIC and BCM63XX only, which is a bit
> small. If we could move the CFE definitions to a shared header, and
> consolidate the value used by bcm47xxpart.c as well, that would allow us
> to build the bcm63xxpart.c file with COMPILE_TEST on other
> architectures. This does not really have functional value, but for
> maintainers like Miquel, it allows them to quickly test their entire
> drivers/mtd/ directory.

I don’t think fw_arg3 available on non mips archs, is it?
I’m happy to move it to a shared header (which would be a good location for this?), but if I’m right it would still be restricted to MIPS.

> -- 
> Florian


______________________________________________________
Linux MTD discussion mailing list
http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-mtd/