On 02/06/20 02:44PM, masonccyang@xxxxxxxxxxx wrote: > > Hi Pratyush, > > > > Subject > > > > Re: [PATCH v4 7/7] mtd: spi-nor: macronix: Add Octal 8D-8D-8D supports > for > > Macronix mx25uw51245g > > > > On 29/05/20 03:36PM, Mason Yang wrote: > > > Macronix mx25uw51245g is a SPI NOR that supports 1-1-1/8-8-8 mode. > > > > > > Correct the dummy cycles to device for various frequencies > > > after xSPI profile 1.0 table parsed. > > > > > > Enable mx25uw51245g to Octal DTR mode by executing the command > sequences > > > to change to octal DTR mode. > > > > > > Signed-off-by: Mason Yang <masonccyang@xxxxxxxxxxx> > > > --- > > > drivers/mtd/spi-nor/macronix.c | 55 > ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++ > > > 1 file changed, 55 insertions(+) > > > > > > diff --git a/drivers/mtd/spi-nor/macronix.c > b/drivers/mtd/spi-nor/macronix.c > > > index 96735d8..6c9a24c 100644 > > > --- a/drivers/mtd/spi-nor/macronix.c > > > +++ b/drivers/mtd/spi-nor/macronix.c > > > @@ -8,6 +8,57 @@ > > > > > > #include "core.h" > > > > > > +#define MXIC_CR2_DUMMY_SET_ADDR 0x300 > > > + > > > +/* Fixup the dummy cycles to device and setup octa_dtr_enable() */ > > > +static void mx25uw51245g_post_sfdp_fixups(struct spi_nor *nor) > > > +{ > > > + struct spi_nor_flash_parameter *params = nor->params; > > > + int ret; > > > + u8 rdc, wdc; > > > + > > > + ret = spi_nor_read_cr2(nor, MXIC_CR2_DUMMY_SET_ADDR, &rdc); > > > + if (ret) > > > + return; > > > + > > > + /* Refer to dummy cycle and frequency table(MHz) */ > > > + switch (params->dummy_cycles) { > > > + case 10: /* 10 dummy cycles for 104 MHz */ > > > + wdc = 5; > > > + break; > > > + case 12: /* 12 dummy cycles for 133 MHz */ > > > + wdc = 4; > > > + break; > > > + case 16: /* 16 dummy cycles for 166 MHz */ > > > + wdc = 2; > > > + break; > > > + case 18: /* 18 dummy cycles for 173 MHz */ > > > + wdc = 1; > > > + break; > > > + case 20: /* 20 dummy cycles for 200 MHz */ > > > + default: > > > + wdc = 0; > > > + } > > > > I don't get the point of this. You already know the fastest the > > mx25uw51245g flash can run at. Why not just use the maximum dummy > > cycles? SPI NOR doesn't know the speed the controller is running at so > > the best it can do is use the maximum dummy cycles possible so it never > > falls short. Sure, it will be _slightly_ less performance, but we will > > be sure to read the correct data, which is much much more important. > > In general, 200MHz needs 20 dummy cycles but some powerful device may only > > needs 18 dummy cycles or less. Yes, but do different mx25uw51245g chips have different dummy cycle requirements? Shouldn't all the chips with the same ID have same performance? This is a fixup hook for mx25uw51245g, so you should already know how many cycles are needed for this specific device. Is there any need for generic code here? > Set a proper dummy cycles for a better performance. > > > > > Is it possible to have two chips which have _exactly_ the same ID but > > one supports say 200MHz frequency but the other doesn't? Without that, > > we can just enable the maximum and move on. > > > -- Regards, Pratyush Yadav ______________________________________________________ Linux MTD discussion mailing list http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-mtd/