On Tue, 2020-06-02 at 09:48 +0200, Boris Brezillon wrote: > Hi Bean, > > On Mon, 01 Jun 2020 23:10:43 +0200 > Bean Huo <huobean@xxxxxxxxx> wrote: > > > Hi Richard > > would you please help us confirm below question?? > > Miquel suggested an approach that would allow us to deal with both > JFFS2 > and UBI/UBIFS without having any FS/wear-leveling specific code at > the > NAND level, but you decided to ignore his comments. Sorry but there's > nothing we can do to help you if you don't listen to our > recommendations. Expose this issue to FS layer, it is not good idea. that will impact more code, and involve duplicated code. > > I've been quite disappointed by your behavior in the past, and it > continues. Recently you've taken Miquel's patches and claimed > ownership did you seem my recent patch? you can ignore that see this. > on them (probably not intentionally, but still) while you were > clearly > unable to rework your original series the way I suggested (which > Miquel > did after seeing you would never send new versions). seriously? > And when Miquel > suggested a change to the implementation he had done based on the > discussion we had with Richard, you decided to ignore it and pursue > in > the original direction. So, quite frankly, I'm really not convinced > you > can conduct such a change. > As Miquel mentioned, we need richard's final comfirmation, If he agrees with this proposal, I give up my current patch. ______________________________________________________ Linux MTD discussion mailing list http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-mtd/