Hi Boris, Boris Brezillon <boris.brezillon@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote on Fri, 29 May 2020 10:11:07 +0200: > On Fri, 29 May 2020 09:47:55 +0200 > Boris Brezillon <boris.brezillon@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > > > On Fri, 29 May 2020 01:15:59 +0200 > > Miquel Raynal <miquel.raynal@xxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > > > > > From: Boris Brezillon <boris.brezillon@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> > > > > > > The name/suffix data_interface is a bit misleading in that the field > > > or functions actually represent a configuration that can be applied by > > > the controller/chip. Let's rename all fields/functions/hooks that are > > > worth renaming. > > > > > > Signed-off-by: Boris Brezillon <boris.brezillon@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> > > > Signed-off-by: Miquel Raynal <miquel.raynal@xxxxxxxxxxx> > > > > I know it's painful to move that one, but I think it should be at the > > beginning of the series so the functions/fields you introduce have the > > right name from the start. > > Hm, maybe I'm wrong and you don't introduce any new interface-related > functions/fields before that one. Indeed, I don't introduce new hooks before this patch. What I do is renaming a few fields, but honestly, before of after, the s/data_interface/interface_config/ applies anyway. ______________________________________________________ Linux MTD discussion mailing list http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-mtd/