Boris Brezillon <boris.brezillon@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote on Thu, 7 May
2020 13:43:30 +0200:
> On Thu, 7 May 2020 13:00:28 +0200
> Miquel Raynal <miquel.raynal@xxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>
> > From: Boris Brezillon <boris.brezillon@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
>
> Hehe. I sent a raw diff and now there's my name on this patch :-).
> Given you debugged/polished it, I'd rather have you take the ownership
> here.
>
> >
> > It seems that several hardware ECC engine use a swapped representation
> > of bytes compared to software.
>
> Some more details here. I think it has to do with how the ECC engine
> is wired to the NAND controller or the order the bits are passed to the
> HW BCH logic. Given the sunxi NAND controller driver has the same
> bit-swapping, I suspect it's actually pretty common.
I'll add these details.
>
> > It means that when the software BCH
> > engine is working in conjunction with data generated with hardware, we
> > must swap the bits inside bytes, eg:
> >
> > 0x0A = b0000_1010 -> b0101_0000 = 0x50
> >
> > Make it possible just by flipping a boolean in the BCH control
>
> ^ by adding a swap_bits boolen to the ...
Yeah I see.
>
> > structure.
>
> Regarding the implementation itself, I came up with something simple
> because I didn't want to spend too much time looking at how things
> could be changed to avoid those swap_bits(). I suspect we can prepare
> the ->a_{mod,pow}_tab tables to avoid that. Ivan, any opinion?
>
> Note that we can also optimize that in a second step, so Miquel can get
> the rest of the series merged.
>
> >
> > Signed-off-by: Boris Brezillon <boris.brezillon@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
> > Signed-off-by: Miquel Raynal <miquel.raynal@xxxxxxxxxxx>
> > Cc: Ivan Djelic <ivan.djelic@xxxxxxxxxx>
> > ---
> > include/linux/bch.h | 1 +
> > lib/bch.c | 84 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++-------
> > 2 files changed, 72 insertions(+), 13 deletions(-)
> >
> > diff --git a/include/linux/bch.h b/include/linux/bch.h
> > index 9c35e7cd5890..c42f50cacfdc 100644
> > --- a/include/linux/bch.h
> > +++ b/include/linux/bch.h
> > @@ -51,6 +51,7 @@ struct bch_control {
> > int *cache;
> > struct gf_poly *elp;
> > struct gf_poly *poly_2t[4];
> > + bool swap_bits;
>
> This new field should be documented.
Indeed.
>
> > };
> >
> > struct bch_control *bch_init(int m, int t, unsigned int prim_poly);
> > diff --git a/lib/bch.c b/lib/bch.c
> > index 1091841ac716..81bf8b426eea 100644
> > --- a/lib/bch.c
> > +++ b/lib/bch.c
> > @@ -114,6 +114,49 @@ struct gf_poly_deg1 {
> > unsigned int c[2];
> > };
> >
> > +static u8 swap_bits_table[] = {
> > + 0x00, 0x80, 0x40, 0xc0, 0x20, 0xa0, 0x60, 0xe0,
> > + 0x10, 0x90, 0x50, 0xd0, 0x30, 0xb0, 0x70, 0xf0,
> > + 0x08, 0x88, 0x48, 0xc8, 0x28, 0xa8, 0x68, 0xe8,
> > + 0x18, 0x98, 0x58, 0xd8, 0x38, 0xb8, 0x78, 0xf8,
> > + 0x04, 0x84, 0x44, 0xc4, 0x24, 0xa4, 0x64, 0xe4,
> > + 0x14, 0x94, 0x54, 0xd4, 0x34, 0xb4, 0x74, 0xf4,
> > + 0x0c, 0x8c, 0x4c, 0xcc, 0x2c, 0xac, 0x6c, 0xec,
> > + 0x1c, 0x9c, 0x5c, 0xdc, 0x3c, 0xbc, 0x7c, 0xfc,
> > + 0x02, 0x82, 0x42, 0xc2, 0x22, 0xa2, 0x62, 0xe2,
> > + 0x12, 0x92, 0x52, 0xd2, 0x32, 0xb2, 0x72, 0xf2,
> > + 0x0a, 0x8a, 0x4a, 0xca, 0x2a, 0xaa, 0x6a, 0xea,
> > + 0x1a, 0x9a, 0x5a, 0xda, 0x3a, 0xba, 0x7a, 0xfa,
> > + 0x06, 0x86, 0x46, 0xc6, 0x26, 0xa6, 0x66, 0xe6,
> > + 0x16, 0x96, 0x56, 0xd6, 0x36, 0xb6, 0x76, 0xf6,
> > + 0x0e, 0x8e, 0x4e, 0xce, 0x2e, 0xae, 0x6e, 0xee,
> > + 0x1e, 0x9e, 0x5e, 0xde, 0x3e, 0xbe, 0x7e, 0xfe,
> > + 0x01, 0x81, 0x41, 0xc1, 0x21, 0xa1, 0x61, 0xe1,
> > + 0x11, 0x91, 0x51, 0xd1, 0x31, 0xb1, 0x71, 0xf1,
> > + 0x09, 0x89, 0x49, 0xc9, 0x29, 0xa9, 0x69, 0xe9,
> > + 0x19, 0x99, 0x59, 0xd9, 0x39, 0xb9, 0x79, 0xf9,
> > + 0x05, 0x85, 0x45, 0xc5, 0x25, 0xa5, 0x65, 0xe5,
> > + 0x15, 0x95, 0x55, 0xd5, 0x35, 0xb5, 0x75, 0xf5,
> > + 0x0d, 0x8d, 0x4d, 0xcd, 0x2d, 0xad, 0x6d, 0xed,
> > + 0x1d, 0x9d, 0x5d, 0xdd, 0x3d, 0xbd, 0x7d, 0xfd,
> > + 0x03, 0x83, 0x43, 0xc3, 0x23, 0xa3, 0x63, 0xe3,
> > + 0x13, 0x93, 0x53, 0xd3, 0x33, 0xb3, 0x73, 0xf3,
> > + 0x0b, 0x8b, 0x4b, 0xcb, 0x2b, 0xab, 0x6b, 0xeb,
> > + 0x1b, 0x9b, 0x5b, 0xdb, 0x3b, 0xbb, 0x7b, 0xfb,
> > + 0x07, 0x87, 0x47, 0xc7, 0x27, 0xa7, 0x67, 0xe7,
> > + 0x17, 0x97, 0x57, 0xd7, 0x37, 0xb7, 0x77, 0xf7,
> > + 0x0f, 0x8f, 0x4f, 0xcf, 0x2f, 0xaf, 0x6f, 0xef,
> > + 0x1f, 0x9f, 0x5f, 0xdf, 0x3f, 0xbf, 0x7f, 0xff,
> > +};
> > +
> > +static u8 swap_bits(struct bch_control *bch, u8 in)
> > +{
> > + if (!bch->swap_bits)
> > + return in;
> > +
> > + return swap_bits_table[in];
> > +}
> > +
> > /*
> > * same as bch_encode(), but process input data one byte at a time
> > */
> > @@ -126,7 +169,9 @@ static void bch_encode_unaligned(struct bch_control *bch,
> > const int l = BCH_ECC_WORDS(bch)-1;
> >
> > while (len--) {
> > - p = bch->mod8_tab + (l+1)*(((ecc[0] >> 24)^(*data++)) & 0xff);
> > + u8 tmp = swap_bits(bch, *data++);
> > +
> > + p = bch->mod8_tab + (l+1)*(((ecc[0] >> 24)^(tmp)) & 0xff);
> >
> > for (i = 0; i < l; i++)
> > ecc[i] = ((ecc[i] << 8)|(ecc[i+1] >> 24))^(*p++);
> > @@ -145,10 +190,16 @@ static void load_ecc8(struct bch_control *bch, uint32_t *dst,
> > unsigned int i, nwords = BCH_ECC_WORDS(bch)-1;
> >
> > for (i = 0; i < nwords; i++, src += 4)
> > - dst[i] = (src[0] << 24)|(src[1] << 16)|(src[2] << 8)|src[3];
> > + dst[i] = ((u32)swap_bits(bch, src[0]) << 24) |
> > + ((u32)swap_bits(bch, src[1]) << 16) |
> > + ((u32)swap_bits(bch, src[2]) << 8) |
> > + swap_bits(bch, src[3]);
> >
> > memcpy(pad, src, BCH_ECC_BYTES(bch)-4*nwords);
> > - dst[nwords] = (pad[0] << 24)|(pad[1] << 16)|(pad[2] << 8)|pad[3];
> > + dst[nwords] = ((u32)swap_bits(bch, pad[0]) << 24) |
> > + ((u32)swap_bits(bch, pad[1]) << 16) |
> > + ((u32)swap_bits(bch, pad[2]) << 8) |
> > + swap_bits(bch, pad[3]);
> > }
> >
> > /*
> > @@ -161,15 +212,15 @@ static void store_ecc8(struct bch_control *bch, uint8_t *dst,
> > unsigned int i, nwords = BCH_ECC_WORDS(bch)-1;
> >
> > for (i = 0; i < nwords; i++) {
> > - *dst++ = (src[i] >> 24);
> > - *dst++ = (src[i] >> 16) & 0xff;
> > - *dst++ = (src[i] >> 8) & 0xff;
> > - *dst++ = (src[i] >> 0) & 0xff;
> > + *dst++ = swap_bits(bch, src[i] >> 24);
> > + *dst++ = swap_bits(bch, src[i] >> 16);
> > + *dst++ = swap_bits(bch, src[i] >> 8);
> > + *dst++ = swap_bits(bch, src[i]);
> > }
> > - pad[0] = (src[nwords] >> 24);
> > - pad[1] = (src[nwords] >> 16) & 0xff;
> > - pad[2] = (src[nwords] >> 8) & 0xff;
> > - pad[3] = (src[nwords] >> 0) & 0xff;
> > + pad[0] = swap_bits(bch, src[nwords] >> 24);
> > + pad[1] = swap_bits(bch, src[nwords] >> 16);
> > + pad[2] = swap_bits(bch, src[nwords] >> 8);
> > + pad[3] = swap_bits(bch, src[nwords]);
> > memcpy(dst, pad, BCH_ECC_BYTES(bch)-4*nwords);
> > }
> >
> > @@ -240,7 +291,12 @@ void bch_encode(struct bch_control *bch, const uint8_t *data,
> > */
> > while (mlen--) {
> > /* input data is read in big-endian format */
> > - w = r[0]^cpu_to_be32(*pdata++);
> > + w = cpu_to_be32(*pdata++);
> > + w = (u32)swap_bits(bch, w) |
> > + ((u32)swap_bits(bch, w >> 8) << 8) |
> > + ((u32)swap_bits(bch, w >> 16) << 16) |
> > + ((u32)swap_bits(bch, w >> 24) << 24);
>
> We should make the bit swapping conditional (only do it if
> bch->swap_bit is true) to not penalize the !swap_bits case.
Sure
>
> > + w ^= r[0];
> > p0 = tab0 + (l+1)*((w >> 0) & 0xff);
> > p1 = tab1 + (l+1)*((w >> 8) & 0xff);
> > p2 = tab2 + (l+1)*((w >> 16) & 0xff);
> > @@ -1048,7 +1104,9 @@ int bch_decode(struct bch_control *bch, const uint8_t *data, unsigned int len,
> > break;
> > }
> > errloc[i] = nbits-1-errloc[i];
> > - errloc[i] = (errloc[i] & ~7)|(7-(errloc[i] & 7));
> > + if (!bch->swap_bits)
> > + errloc[i] = (errloc[i] & ~7) |
> > + (7-(errloc[i] & 7));
> > }
> > }
> > return (err >= 0) ? err : -EBADMSG;
>
> Oh, and we should patch bch_init() to take a bool swap_bits. I'm not
> comfortable having users set bch_control fields on their own,
> especially one that's marked 'private'.
Oh yeah, I had this in mind but I completely forgot. I'll do it.
______________________________________________________
Linux MTD discussion mailing list
http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-mtd/
Re: [PATCH v3 2/8] lib/bch: Allow easy bit swapping
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
- Subject: Re: [PATCH v3 2/8] lib/bch: Allow easy bit swapping
- From: Miquel Raynal <miquel.raynal@xxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Thu, 7 May 2020 16:09:30 +0200
- Cc: Mark Rutland <mark.rutland@xxxxxxx>, devicetree@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx, Michal Simek <monstr@xxxxxxxxx>, Vignesh Raghavendra <vigneshr@xxxxxx>, Tudor Ambarus <Tudor.Ambarus@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>, Richard Weinberger <richard@xxxxxx>, Rob Herring <robh+dt@xxxxxxxxxx>, linux-mtd@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx, Thomas Petazzoni <thomas.petazzoni@xxxxxxxxxxx>, Naga Sureshkumar Relli <nagasure@xxxxxxxxxx>, Ivan Djelic <ivan.djelic@xxxxxxxxxx>
- In-reply-to: <20200507134330.6e8a9f80@collabora.com>
- Organization: Bootlin
- References: <20200507110034.14736-1-miquel.raynal@bootlin.com> <20200507110034.14736-3-miquel.raynal@bootlin.com> <20200507134330.6e8a9f80@collabora.com>
- References:
- [PATCH v3 0/8] New Arasan NAND controller driver
- From: Miquel Raynal
- [PATCH v3 2/8] lib/bch: Allow easy bit swapping
- From: Miquel Raynal
- Re: [PATCH v3 2/8] lib/bch: Allow easy bit swapping
- From: Boris Brezillon
- [PATCH v3 0/8] New Arasan NAND controller driver
- Prev by Date: Re: [PATCH v3 7/8] mtd: rawnand: arasan: Add new Arasan NAND controller
- Next by Date: Re: [PATCH v3 1/8] lib/bch: Rework a little bit the exported function names
- Previous by thread: Re: [PATCH v3 2/8] lib/bch: Allow easy bit swapping
- Next by thread: [PATCH v3 3/8] mtd: rawnand: Ensure the number of bitflips is consistent
- Index(es):
 |