The logic in nand_do_read_ops() is to use a bufpoi variable, either set to the original buffer, or set to a bounce buffer which in the end happens to be chip->data_buf depending on the value of the use_bounce_buf boolean. This is not a reason to call chip->data_buf directly when we know that we are using the bounce buffer. Let's use bufpoi instead to be consistent. Signed-off-by: Miquel Raynal <miquel.raynal@xxxxxxxxxxx> Reviewed-by: Boris Brezillon <boris.brezillon@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> --- drivers/mtd/nand/raw/nand_base.c | 2 +- 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-) diff --git a/drivers/mtd/nand/raw/nand_base.c b/drivers/mtd/nand/raw/nand_base.c index efde1f0fe2a9..1b7d7574dfc0 100644 --- a/drivers/mtd/nand/raw/nand_base.c +++ b/drivers/mtd/nand/raw/nand_base.c @@ -3243,7 +3243,7 @@ static int nand_do_read_ops(struct nand_chip *chip, loff_t from, /* Invalidate page cache */ chip->pagecache.page = -1; } - memcpy(buf, chip->data_buf + col, bytes); + memcpy(buf, bufpoi + col, bytes); } if (unlikely(oob)) { -- 2.20.1 ______________________________________________________ Linux MTD discussion mailing list http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-mtd/