On Wed, 6 May 2020 21:23:18 +0200 (CEST) Richard Weinberger <richard@xxxxxx> wrote: > ----- Ursprüngliche Mail ----- > > Von: "Boris Brezillon" <boris.brezillon@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> > > An: "richard" <richard@xxxxxx> > > CC: "Bean Huo, beanhuo" <beanhuo@xxxxxxxxxx>, "Miquel Raynal" <miquel.raynal@xxxxxxxxxxx>, "Vignesh Raghavendra" > > <vigneshr@xxxxxx>, "Tudor Ambarus" <Tudor.Ambarus@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>, "linux-mtd" <linux-mtd@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>, "Steve > > deRosier" <derosier@xxxxxxxxx>, "Thomas Petazzoni" <thomas.petazzoni@xxxxxxxxxxx>, "tglx" <tglx@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>, "Zoltan > > Szubbocsev, zszubbocsev" <zszubbocsev@xxxxxxxxxx>, "Piotr Wojtaszczyk" <WojtaszczykP@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> > > Gesendet: Mittwoch, 6. Mai 2020 21:01:58 > > Betreff: Re: [EXT] [PATCH v2 3/3] mtd: rawnand: micron: Address the shallow erase issue > > > On Wed, 6 May 2020 20:44:29 +0200 (CEST) > > Richard Weinberger <richard@xxxxxx> wrote: > > > >> Bean, Boris, > >> > >> ----- Ursprüngliche Mail ----- > >> >> > Concerning this, I still have question, for the UBIFS, If I am > >> >> > correct, there are EC and VID header both being damaged, then UBIFS > >> >> > will re-erase it. I don't know if UBIFS can handle there is dirty/filling data > >> >> > in the > >> >> some pages and EC/VID valid. > >> > >> Uhh. Damaging just payload asks for trouble. > > > > I'd expect UBI to just mark the LEB as bad and schedule it for erasure > > (again, pretty similar to an interrupted erase). > > UBI scans only headers during attach. If you don't touch these, no way. Sorry, I misunderstood what you meant by payload. UBI should schedule the PEB for erase if the EC/VID header is corrupted. ______________________________________________________ Linux MTD discussion mailing list http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-mtd/