Hi Boris, Boris Brezillon <boris.brezillon@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote on Wed, 29 Apr 2020 18:08:16 +0200: > On Wed, 29 Apr 2020 17:55:32 +0200 > Miquel Raynal <miquel.raynal@xxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > > > NAND controller drivers can set the NAND_USE_BOUNCE_BUFFER flag to a > > chip 'option' field. With this flag, the core is responsible of > > providing DMA-able buffers. > > > > The current behavior is to not force the use of a bounce buffer when > > the core thinks this is not needed. So in the end the name is a bit > > misleading, because in theory we will always have a DMA buffer but in > > practice it will not always be a bounce buffer. > > > > Rename this flag NAND_USE_DMA_BUFFER to be more accurate. > > I still think this one should be named NAND_CONTROLLER_USES_DMA. Actually I want to rework all the flags and prefix them with NAND_CONTROLLER, that's why I am keeping the NAND_ prefix. I can change the _USE_DMA_BUFFER into _USES_DMA though. ______________________________________________________ Linux MTD discussion mailing list http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-mtd/