Hello, "Ramuthevar, Vadivel MuruganX" <vadivel.muruganx.ramuthevar@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote on Tue, 28 Apr 2020 15:50:06 +0800: > Hi Miquel, > > On 28/4/2020 3:40 pm, Miquel Raynal wrote: > > Hi Vadivel MuruganX, > > > > "Ramuthevar, Vadivel MuruganX" > > <vadivel.muruganx.ramuthevar@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote on Tue, 28 Apr 2020 > > 14:50:35 +0800: > > > >> Hi Boris, > >> > >> On 28/4/2020 2:47 pm, Boris Brezillon wrote: > >>> On Tue, 28 Apr 2020 14:40:58 +0800 > >>> "Ramuthevar, Vadivel MuruganX" > >>> <vadivel.muruganx.ramuthevar@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > >>> >>>> Hi Boris, > >>>> > >>>> On 28/4/2020 2:27 pm, Boris Brezillon wrote: > >>>>> On Tue, 28 Apr 2020 14:17:30 +0800 > >>>>> "Ramuthevar, Vadivel MuruganX" > >>>>> <vadivel.muruganx.ramuthevar@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > >>>>> >>>> Hi Miquel, > >>>>>> > >>>>>> Thank you very much for the review comments and your time... > >>>>>> > >>>>>> On 27/4/2020 11:51 pm, Miquel Raynal wrote: > >>>>>>> Hi Ramuthevar, > >>>>>>> >>>>>>> +static int ebu_nand_probe(struct platform_device *pdev) > >>>>>>>>> +{ > >>>>>>>>> + struct device *dev = &pdev->dev; > >>>>>>>>> + struct ebu_nand_controller *ebu_host; > >>>>>>>>> + struct nand_chip *nand; > >>>>>>>>> + phys_addr_t nandaddr_pa; > >>>>>>>>> + struct mtd_info *mtd; > >>>>>>>>> + struct resource *res; > >>>>>>>>> + int ret; > >>>>>>>>> + u32 cs; > >>>>>>>>> + > >>>>>>>>> + ebu_host = devm_kzalloc(dev, sizeof(*ebu_host), GFP_KERNEL); > >>>>>>>>> + if (!ebu_host) > >>>>>>>>> + return -ENOMEM; > >>>>>>>>> + > >>>>>>>>> + ebu_host->dev = dev; > >>>>>>>>> + nand_controller_init(&ebu_host->controller); > >>>>>>>>> + > >>>>>>>>> + res = platform_get_resource_byname(pdev, IORESOURCE_MEM, "ebunand"); > >>>>>>>>> + ebu_host->ebu_addr = devm_ioremap_resource(&pdev->dev, res); > >>>>>>>>> + if (IS_ERR(ebu_host->ebu_addr)) > >>>>>>>>> + return PTR_ERR(ebu_host->ebu_addr); > >>>>>>>>> + > >>>>>>>>> + res = platform_get_resource_byname(pdev, IORESOURCE_MEM, "hsnand"); > >>>>>>>>> + ebu_host->nand_addr = devm_ioremap_resource(&pdev->dev, res); > >>>>>>>>> + if (IS_ERR(ebu_host->nand_addr)) > >>>>>>>>> + return PTR_ERR(ebu_host->nand_addr); > >>>>>>>>> + > >>>>>>>>> + ret = device_property_read_u32(dev, "nand,cs", &cs); > >>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>> CS ids should be encoded in the reg property (see [1]). > >>>>>>> > >>>>>>> Is it your choice to only support a single CS or is it actually a > >>>>>>> controller limitation? > >>>>>> > >>>>>> Yes , its controller limitation to support only one CS > >>>>> > >>>>> I'm pretty sure that's not true, otherwise you wouldn't have to select > >>>>> the CS you want to use :P. > >>>> > >>>> At a time it supports only one chip select. > >>> > >>> Yes, like 99% of the NAND controllers, but that doesn't mean you can't > >>> support multi-CS chips. All you have to do is attach an array of > >>> ebu_nand_cs to your ebu_nand_chip (as done in the atmel driver I > >>> pointed to). nand_operation.cs tells you which CS (index in your > >>> ebu_nand_cs array) a specific operation is targeting, and you can pick > >>> the right MMIO range/reg value based on that. > >> > >> Agreed, sure I will add that and update next series of patches . > > > > There are also many other places where you assume blindly that there > > is only one CS. You can check the Atmel NAND controller driver as Boris > > said and we will probably propose more little changes to be more > > generic. > since LGM EBU_NAND controller supports only one chip select at a time, so assumed like that, will change as generic way if consider like more chip select supports, Thanks! What do you mean "at a time"? Do we have access to the spec or a register map? We could tell you very quickly if it is worth the trouble. But I am pretty sure as well that the controller supports more than 1 CS. > Sure , I will do the changes as per your review comments. > > > > Thanks, > > Miquèl > > Thanks, Miquèl ______________________________________________________ Linux MTD discussion mailing list http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-mtd/