Hi, John, On Sunday, April 26, 2020 6:15:24 PM EEST Tudor.Ambarus@xxxxxxxxxxxxx wrote: > > 0x50444653). I printed the family id, and it is 81h, which seems to > > align with S25FS (which should support SFDP). Confused. > > We can differentiate between flashes by the family id: 80h for FL-S and 81h > for FS-S. If I understood correctly your flash id is 0x01, 0x20, 0x18, > 0x4d, 0x01, 0x81. According to the spansion datasheets, this should > identify with a s25fs128s1 entry. Please check the patch from below, let me > know if it's ok. I see that Yicong already did such a patch, check https:// patchwork.ozlabs.org/project/linux-mtd/patch/1587546809-3797-1-git-send-email- yangyicong@xxxxxxxxxxxxx/ > > What's more, the spi-nor probe is failing for this part since I enabled > > quad spi. So I am interested to know if there is some differences > > between these part families for that. Might fail because of the page_size problem. We're trying to fix it soon. Cheers, ta ______________________________________________________ Linux MTD discussion mailing list http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-mtd/