Hi, Sergei, On Friday, April 3, 2020 11:49:48 PM EEST Sergei Shtylyov wrote: > EXTERNAL EMAIL: Do not click links or open attachments unless you know the > content is safe > > When adding the 'info' field to 'struct spi_nor', some acronyms were in > lower case and some in upper case and the JEDEC acronym mistyped -- fix > these issues. > > Fixes: 46dde01f6bab ("mtd: spi-nor: add spi_nor_init() function") > Signed-off-by: Sergei Shtylyov <sergei.shtylyov@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> > > --- > Changes in version 2: > - rebased to the 'spi-nor/next' branch of the MTD repo. > > include/linux/mtd/spi-nor.h | 2 +- > 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-) > > Index: linux/include/linux/mtd/spi-nor.h > =================================================================== > --- linux.orig/include/linux/mtd/spi-nor.h > +++ linux/include/linux/mtd/spi-nor.h > @@ -335,7 +335,7 @@ struct spi_nor_flash_parameter; > * @bouncebuf: bounce buffer used when the buffer passed by the MTD > * layer is not DMA-able > * @bouncebuf_size: size of the bounce buffer > - * @info: spi-nor part JDEC MFR id and other info > + * @info: SPI-NOR part JEDEC MFR ID and other info There is an inconsistency in this file when referring to SPI NOR. It's either called SPI-NOR or "SPI NOR". While I don't have a preference whether to keep the "-" or not, I think we should be consistent across the file and use just a format. So would you care to fix all the comments in spi-nor.h? > * @manufacturer: spi-nor manufacturer ^ here's another problem. Also, I think I would fix all these typos in a single patch, the fixes are trivial enough, without affecting functionality and I'm not sure it is worth backporting them. But again I don't have a strong opinion, so if you want to keep these in separate commits that's ok for me. Cheers, ta ______________________________________________________ Linux MTD discussion mailing list http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-mtd/