On Thu, Apr 16, 2020 at 4:55 PM ron minnich <rminnich@xxxxxxxxx> wrote: > On Thu, Apr 16, 2020 at 2:51 AM Linus Walleij <linus.walleij@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > > > I suppose the use case is using PCI-based MTD devices for testing > > something android images on desktops? I'm surprised it didn't > > come up earlier. > > Thanks. In this case it's for systems that companies are deploying > into their data centers, using linuxboot (linuxboot.org) and Intel > chipsets. On Intel chipsets, there is a 64 MiB SPI part, but only 16 > MiB is directly addressable. Aha, now I get the use case. > Linux goes in the memory-addressable part of the SPI, and UEFI loads > it into RAM, since to UEFI the kernel is just another UEFI driver -- > in fact in most cases we replace the UEFI shell with Linux. > > But we need a file system, and with the huge amount of drivers that > come with UEFI there's not much room in the top 16M. (we're working to > fix that glitch, a process we call DXE-ectomy, but it takes time). > > We wish to place a file system in the low 48 MiB -- lots of room there. > > So what one can do is put a squashfs-formatted file system in that low > part of SPI, and, using this mtdparts capability, point the kernel at > it ("root=/dev/mtd1 mtdparts=[a:b.c]etc.etc"). It's a lifesaver for > those of us using u-root for our userland. This makes a lot of sense. Something I have had ideas about upstreaming is the partition splitter and automatic rootfs configuration from OpenWrt. Is this something you would have an interest in for your type of deployments? I post some of my (never finished) commit text for your reference: What the MTD partition splitter code does is to take a partition, already covering an even number of erase blocks in the flash, and subdivide it at erase block granularity into sub-partitions. This structure is created when the raw images are produced during compilation of a system: scripts that are aware of the geometry of the flash (such as erase block size) will catenate the different parts into a compound partition that can later be split. The typical consituents of a split partition are: [kernel (z)Image] "kernel" squashfs rootfs "rootfs" JFFS2 writeable area "rootfs_data" In the simplified case only the squashfs and JFFS2 are combined into one split partition, let's say this partition is named "firmware" (a common convention). The typical scenario for the above layout is: - Begin compiling the flash image with the kernel image, pad that up to the end of the current erase block - Catenate the squashfs and pad that up to the end of the current erase block - Catenate a JFFS2 emtpy filesystem" marker at the beginning of the next erase block When the splitter examines this, it will split this "firmware" partition into a kernel partion, a squashfs "rootfs" partition, and a partition with just empty space named "rootfs_data", while still keeping the overarching "firmware" partition in place. When the kernel boots, it will mount the squashfs "rootfs" partition as root filesystem, and then when the system properly comes up mount the "rootfs_data" partition with overlayfs so that the root filesystem becomes writeable, while keeping all the read-only content in the squashfs and all modifications in the JFFS2 partition. This way all the available flash memory in the "firmware" partition is used pretty optimally: "kernel" can grow to the size it needs (such as a new kernel version taking up more space) same for the squashfs "rootfs" after it. Whatever remains after the kernel and the rootfs can be used for storing data. When the device kernel and rootfs needs to be upgraded, it can simply unmount the filesystems and overwrite and erase the "firmware" partition with the new version, and the whole system is dynamically repartitioned with the new images: if they grew over a flash block boundary then the filesystem will be augmented upwards. Yours, Linus Walleij ______________________________________________________ Linux MTD discussion mailing list http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-mtd/