When "ubifs: introduce UBIFS_ATIME_SUPPORT to ubifs" introduced atime support to ubifs, it also added lazytime support. As far as I can tell the lazytime support is terminally broken, as it causes mark_inode_dirty_sync to be called from __writeback_single_inode, which will then trigger the locking assert in ubifs_dirty_inode. Just remove the broken lazytime support for now, it can be added back later, especially as some infrastructure changes should make that easier soon. Fixes: 8c1c5f263833 ("ubifs: introduce UBIFS_ATIME_SUPPORT to ubifs") Signed-off-by: Christoph Hellwig <hch@xxxxxx> --- fs/ubifs/file.c | 6 +----- 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 5 deletions(-) diff --git a/fs/ubifs/file.c b/fs/ubifs/file.c index 743928efffc1..49fe062ce45e 100644 --- a/fs/ubifs/file.c +++ b/fs/ubifs/file.c @@ -1375,7 +1375,6 @@ int ubifs_update_time(struct inode *inode, struct timespec64 *time, struct ubifs_info *c = inode->i_sb->s_fs_info; struct ubifs_budget_req req = { .dirtied_ino = 1, .dirtied_ino_d = ALIGN(ui->data_len, 8) }; - int iflags = I_DIRTY_TIME; int err, release; if (!IS_ENABLED(CONFIG_UBIFS_ATIME_SUPPORT)) @@ -1393,11 +1392,8 @@ int ubifs_update_time(struct inode *inode, struct timespec64 *time, if (flags & S_MTIME) inode->i_mtime = *time; - if (!(inode->i_sb->s_flags & SB_LAZYTIME)) - iflags |= I_DIRTY_SYNC; - release = ui->dirty; - __mark_inode_dirty(inode, iflags); + __mark_inode_dirty(inode, I_DIRTY_SYNC); mutex_unlock(&ui->ui_mutex); if (release) ubifs_release_budget(c, &req); -- 2.25.1 ______________________________________________________ Linux MTD discussion mailing list http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-mtd/