Re: [PATCH v4] mtd: clear cache_state to avoid writing to bad blocks repeatedly

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On 2020/3/31 18:05, Greg KH wrote:
On Tue, Mar 31, 2020 at 09:31:59AM +0800, Xiaoming Ni wrote:
The function call process is as follows:
	mtd_blktrans_work()
	  while (1)
	    do_blktrans_request()
	      mtdblock_writesect()
	        do_cached_write()
	          write_cached_data() /*if cache_state is STATE_DIRTY*/
	            erase_write()

write_cached_data() returns failure without modifying cache_state
and cache_offset. So when do_cached_write() is called again,
write_cached_data() will be called again to perform erase_write()
on the same cache_offset.

But if this cache_offset points to a bad block, erase_write() will
always return -EIO. Writing to this mtdblk is equivalent to losing
the current data, and repeatedly writing to the bad block.

Repeatedly writing a bad block has no real benefits,
but brings some negative effects:
1 Lost subsequent data
2 Loss of flash device life
3 erase_write() bad blocks are very time-consuming. For example:
	the function do_erase_oneblock() in chips/cfi_cmdset_0020.c or
	chips/cfi_cmdset_0002.c may take more than 20 seconds to return

Therefore, when erase_write() returns -EIO in write_cached_data(),
clear cache_state to avoid writing to bad blocks repeatedly.

Signed-off-by: Xiaoming Ni <nixiaoming@xxxxxxxxxx>
Reviewed-by: Miquel Raynal <miquel.raynal@xxxxxxxxxxx>
---
  drivers/mtd/mtdblock.c | 11 +++++++----
  1 file changed, 7 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-)

$ ./scripts/get_maintainer.pl --file drivers/mtd/mtdblock.c
Miquel Raynal <miquel.raynal@xxxxxxxxxxx> (maintainer:MEMORY TECHNOLOGY DEVICES (MTD))
Richard Weinberger <richard@xxxxxx> (maintainer:MEMORY TECHNOLOGY DEVICES (MTD))
Vignesh Raghavendra <vigneshr@xxxxxx> (maintainer:MEMORY TECHNOLOGY DEVICES (MTD))
linux-mtd@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx (open list:MEMORY TECHNOLOGY DEVICES (MTD))
linux-kernel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx (open list)


No where on there is my name/email, so why am I getting these?

confused,

greg k-h

At v3, I added Cc: stable@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx and emailed you,
At v4, Cc: stable@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx was deleted, but forgot to remove you from the recipient list
I'm very sorry to bother you
Thanks
Xiaoming Ni


______________________________________________________
Linux MTD discussion mailing list
http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-mtd/



[Index of Archives]     [LARTC]     [Bugtraq]     [Yosemite Forum]     [Photo]

  Powered by Linux