----- Ursprüngliche Mail ----- > Von: "Gustavo A. R. Silva" <gustavo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> > An: "richard" <richard@xxxxxx>, "Miquel Raynal" <miquel.raynal@xxxxxxxxxxx>, "Vignesh Raghavendra" <vigneshr@xxxxxx> > CC: "linux-mtd" <linux-mtd@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>, "linux-kernel" <linux-kernel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>, "Gustavo A. R. Silva" > <gustavo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> > Gesendet: Donnerstag, 19. März 2020 23:44:35 > Betreff: [PATCH][next] mtd: ubi: ubi-media.h: Replace zero-length array with flexible-array member > The current codebase makes use of the zero-length array language > extension to the C90 standard, but the preferred mechanism to declare > variable-length types such as these ones is a flexible array member[1][2], > introduced in C99: > > struct foo { > int stuff; > struct boo array[]; > }; > > By making use of the mechanism above, we will get a compiler warning > in case the flexible array does not occur last in the structure, which > will help us prevent some kind of undefined behavior bugs from being > inadvertently introduced[3] to the codebase from now on. > > Also, notice that, dynamic memory allocations won't be affected by > this change: > > "Flexible array members have incomplete type, and so the sizeof operator > may not be applied. As a quirk of the original implementation of > zero-length arrays, sizeof evaluates to zero."[1] > > This issue was found with the help of Coccinelle. > > [1] https://gcc.gnu.org/onlinedocs/gcc/Zero-Length.html > [2] https://github.com/KSPP/linux/issues/21 > [3] commit 76497732932f ("cxgb3/l2t: Fix undefined behaviour") > > Signed-off-by: Gustavo A. R. Silva <gustavo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> Applied. Thanks! Thanks, //richard ______________________________________________________ Linux MTD discussion mailing list http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-mtd/