Hi Mika, Mika Westerberg <mika.westerberg@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote on Mon, 30 Mar 2020 09:08:59 +0300: > No objections from my side :) > > On Fri, Mar 27, 2020 at 04:53:28PM -0700, ron minnich wrote: > > OK, I've done a quick prototype of using () as one way to specify the > > ID. The mtparts can look like this (tested) > > > > mtdparts=(0000:00:1f.5)25165824(BIOS),-(squashfs) Would it be hard to support an extra ':' after the MTD device name? This way would would allow anything inside the optional '(' ')' but would keep the trailing ':'. toTay: mtdparts=name:part1,part2 So: mtdparts=(0000:00:1f.5):25165824(BIOS),-(squashfs) ? > > > > The text in () can be pretty arbitrary; only ) is disallowed. > > It's about 10 more lines of code in cmdlinepart.c and that's it. > > Further, the existing syntax is still supported: > > mtdparts=id:parts > > > > what do you think? > > > > thanks > > > > ron > > > > On Fri, Mar 27, 2020 at 10:39 AM ron minnich <rminnich@xxxxxxxxx> wrote: > > > > > > yeah, :: is not so bad, but you've got a lot of corner cases as you check for :: > > > mtdparts=0: > > > for one example. > > > > > > Covering all the ways things can go wrong gets messy. You can pretty > > > much guarantee all those corner cases will get exercised ... > > > > > > And people are going to mess this up and end up with hard to debug errors: > > > mtdparts=0000::0:1f.3:parts > > > > > > That could be a hard error to spot. > > > > > > I still wonder if we should not just define some character as > > > available in addition to :. I realize | was pretty awful, but ... is > > > there some other character we might use? I kind of like the simplicity > > > of the current scheme; there really would be no issue had it been > > > almost anything but a : :-) > > > > > > But if the sense is that :: is the way to go, I can give it a shot. > > > > > > ron > > > > > > On Fri, Mar 27, 2020 at 10:16 AM Mika Westerberg > > > <mika.westerberg@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > > > > > > > > On Fri, Mar 27, 2020 at 10:05:52AM -0700, ron minnich wrote: > > > > > I did try the \ thing but found it a bit tricky to work with, with > > > > > lots of potential for simple errors. > > > > > > > > > > It would require cmdlines like this > > > > > mtdparts=0000\:00\:0.1f:etcetc > > > > > > > > > > A lot of these mtdparts definitions are produced by scripts and > > > > > Makefiles and there are many, many places where \\ have a way of > > > > > vanishing. > > > > > > > > Right. One option would be to use the printf() style escaping and make > > > > :: to be literal : in the same way %% is literal %. Thanks, Miquèl ______________________________________________________ Linux MTD discussion mailing list http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-mtd/