Hi all, this is my take on Teds take on Erics bug report about ext4 inodes beeing kept dirty after sync. After looking into the area I found a few other loose ends, so the series has grown a bit. ______________________________________________________ Linux MTD discussion mailing list http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-mtd/
lazytime fixes
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
- Subject: lazytime fixes
- From: Christoph Hellwig <hch@xxxxxx>
- Date: Wed, 25 Mar 2020 13:28:21 +0100
- Cc: linux-kernel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx, linux-f2fs-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx, Eric Biggers <ebiggers@xxxxxxxxxx>, linux-mtd@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx, linux-fsdevel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx, linux-ext4@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
- Follow-Ups:
- [PATCH 4/4] fs: clean up generic_update_time a bit
- From: Christoph Hellwig
- [PATCH 3/4] fs: don't call ->dirty_inode for lazytime timestamp updates
- From: Christoph Hellwig
- [PATCH 2/4] fs: avoid double-writing the inode on a lazytime expiration
- From: Christoph Hellwig
- [PATCH 1/4] ubifs: remove broken lazytime support
- From: Christoph Hellwig
- [PATCH 4/4] fs: clean up generic_update_time a bit
- Prev by Date: Re: [PATCH] mtd: Convert fallthrough comments into statements
- Next by Date: [PATCH 1/4] ubifs: remove broken lazytime support
- Previous by thread: [PATCH] MAINTAINERS: Add the IRC channel to the MTD related subsystems
- Next by thread: [PATCH 1/4] ubifs: remove broken lazytime support
- Index(es):
 |