I agree with you on changing the PCI driver name, as opposed to this change. I don't like '|' very much either. I am thinking just to change ':' to '.', e.g. 0000:00:1f.3 -> 0000.00.1f.3 It is an extremely simple change -- add one for loop in the pci map code -- and nothing else need change. If this sounds good to you, I'll send a new 2-patch series with that change and with the intel-spi driver changed to show how one can use command line partitioning? Also, as I am coming back to this after a very long time, how do you like your patch series to look? It seems the git command to generate these creates 3 files, the first numbered 0 with no code in it. My reading of the docs implies sending this no-code email is not a good idea? Any recommendations here? thanks very much for your comment! ron On Sun, Mar 22, 2020 at 4:09 AM Miquel Raynal <miquel.raynal@xxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > > Hi Ronald, > > ron minnich <rminnich@xxxxxxxxx> wrote on Sat, 21 Mar 2020 08:44:07 > -0700: > > > Anyone? This will be going into use at Google internally and I'd like > > to get it upstream. > > > > The only other option that would work is to take the pci-format names > > created by intel-spi-pci that have : in them and change the : to '.'. > > Is that more acceptable? > > One important thing to note: Bootloaders share the same mtdparts > definition and should be updated if we decide to support a new > separator. U-boot and Barebox at least. > > I think changing just Intel's PCI driver name would be much more > practical for us because I don't find the '|' separator being > descriptive at all. > > However, I don't have a strong position and I would welcome > Richard, Vignesh, Tudor and Boris' point of view. > > Thanks, > Miquèl ______________________________________________________ Linux MTD discussion mailing list http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-mtd/