Re: [PATCH 1/3] mtd: spi-nor: reimplement block protection handling

[<Tudor.Ambarus@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>]

Hi, Jungseung,

I'm going to respin your patches on top on the what will be the manufacturer 
move v2 series, https://patchwork.ozlabs.org/cover/1247794/, I want both 
included for next.

On Wednesday, March 4, 2020 1:07:58 PM EET Jungseung Lee wrote:
> The current mainline locking was restricted and could only be applied
> to flashes that has 3 block protection bit and fixed locking ratio.
> 
> A new method of normalization was reached at the end of the discussion [1].
> 
>     (1) - if bp slot is insufficient.
>     (2) - if bp slot is sufficient.
> 
>     if (bp_slots_needed > bp_slots)    // (1)
>         min_prot_length = sector_size << (bp_slots_needed - bp_slots);
>     else                               // (2)
>         min_prot_length = sector_size;
> 
> This patch changes block protection handling logic based on min_prot_length.
> It is suitable for the overall flashes with exception of some corner case

What corner case, do you refer to EON? Are you aware of other corner cases? We 
should be more precise, for easier review and understanding.

Cheers,
ta

> and easy to extend and apply for the case of 2bit or 4bit block protection.
> 
> [1] http://lists.infradead.org/pipermail/linux-mtd/2020-February/093934.html




______________________________________________________
Linux MTD discussion mailing list
http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-mtd/