Hi Boris, On Wed, Mar 11, 2020 at 5:31 PM Boris Brezillon <boris.brezillon@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > Looks like 2 regressions, indeed. Would you mind sending 2 fixes for > that? Yes, sure no problem. Which tree/branch should I base the fixes on? Stable/linux-5.5.y? Regards, Victor Fusco ______________________________________________________ Linux MTD discussion mailing list http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-mtd/
Re: Possible regression regarding the name and size of MTD devices on kernel 5.5.4
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
- Subject: Re: Possible regression regarding the name and size of MTD devices on kernel 5.5.4
- From: Victor Fusco <victor@xxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Wed, 11 Mar 2020 18:00:59 -0300
- In-reply-to: <20200311213120.0141aec0@collabora.com>
- References: <CAHpUXUx8puujULLTtLTDEvEVG+gasJcmj9QxLC5vf69+WzL74g@mail.gmail.com> <20200311213120.0141aec0@collabora.com>
- References:
- Possible regression regarding the name and size of MTD devices on kernel 5.5.4
- From: Victor Fusco
- Re: Possible regression regarding the name and size of MTD devices on kernel 5.5.4
- From: Boris Brezillon
- Possible regression regarding the name and size of MTD devices on kernel 5.5.4
- Prev by Date: Re: [GIT PULL] fscrypt fix for v5.6-rc6
- Next by Date: Re: [PATCH v3 3/4] mtd: rawnand: Add support manufacturer specific suspend/resume operation
- Previous by thread: Re: Possible regression regarding the name and size of MTD devices on kernel 5.5.4
- Next by thread: [PATCH v3 00/12] mtd: spi-nor: add xSPI Octal DTR support
- Index(es):
 |