Re: [PATCH v3 1/4] mtd: rawnand: Add support manufacturer specific lock/unlock operation

[Miquel Raynal <miquel.raynal@xxxxxxxxxxx>]

Hi Mason, Boris,

masonccyang@xxxxxxxxxxx wrote on Wed, 11 Mar 2020 10:40:04 +0800:

> Hi Boris,
> 
> > > Add nand_lock() & nand_unlock() for manufacturer specific lock &   
> unlock
> > > operation while the device supports Block Portection function.
> > > 
> > > Signed-off-by: Mason Yang <masonccyang@xxxxxxxxxxx>
> > > Reported-by: kbuild test robot <lkp@xxxxxxxxx>  
> > 
> > Reported-by on something that's not a fix doesn't make sense. I know
> > the 0day bot asked you to add this tag, but that should only be done if
> > you submit a separate patch, ideally with a Fixes tag. If the offending
> > patch has not been merged yet, you should just fix the commit and ignore
> > the Reported-by tag (you can mention who reported the problem in the
> > changelog though).

Yesterday when applying all the NAND patches my personal IP address got
flagged as spam by mistake (~500 mails in ~10s) so I could not answer
manually as I wished.

Indeed, this Reported-by tag was not needed and I dropped it manually
when applying. This tag is meant to show an error that was existing
*before* your series and that you are fixing with your series. This is
not something you should add when a robot tells you something is wrong
in your series.

Also, I rewrote several paragraphs and I prefixed two of them with "mtd:
rawnand: macronix:".

Thanks,
Miquèl

______________________________________________________
Linux MTD discussion mailing list
http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-mtd/