How to handle write-protect pin of NAND device ?

[Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@xxxxxxxxxx>]

Hi.

I have a question about the
WP_n pin of a NAND chip.


As far as I see, the NAND framework does not
handle it.

Instead, it is handled in a driver level.
I see some DT-bindings that handle the WP_n pin.

$ git grep wp -- Documentation/devicetree/bindings/mtd/
Documentation/devicetree/bindings/mtd/brcm,brcmnand.txt:-
brcm,nand-has-wp          : Some versions of this IP include a
write-protect
Documentation/devicetree/bindings/mtd/ingenic,jz4780-nand.txt:-
wp-gpios: GPIO specifier for the write protect pin.
Documentation/devicetree/bindings/mtd/ingenic,jz4780-nand.txt:
         wp-gpios = <&gpf 22 GPIO_ACTIVE_LOW>;
Documentation/devicetree/bindings/mtd/nvidia-tegra20-nand.txt:-
wp-gpios: GPIO specifier for the write protect pin.
Documentation/devicetree/bindings/mtd/nvidia-tegra20-nand.txt:
         wp-gpios = <&gpio TEGRA_GPIO(S, 0) GPIO_ACTIVE_LOW>;



I wrote a patch to avoid read-only issue in some cases:
http://patchwork.ozlabs.org/patch/1229749/

Generally speaking, we expect NAND devices
are writable in Linux. So, I think my patch is OK.


However, I asked this myself:
Is there a useful case to assert the write protect
pin in order to make the NAND chip really read-only?
For example, the system recovery image is stored in
a read-only device, and the write-protect pin is
kept asserted to assure nobody accidentally corrupts it.

But, I am not sure if it should be handled in the
framework level with a more generic DT-binding.


Comments are appreciated.

--
Best Regards
Masahiro Yamada

______________________________________________________
Linux MTD discussion mailing list
http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-mtd/