Re: [PATCH] ubifs: use IS_ENCRYPTED() instead of ubifs_crypt_is_encrypted()

[Eric Biggers <ebiggers@xxxxxxxxxx>]

On Thu, Jan 09, 2020 at 09:01:09AM +0100, Richard Weinberger wrote:
> On Fri, Jan 3, 2020 at 6:09 PM Eric Biggers <ebiggers@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> >
> > On Mon, Dec 09, 2019 at 01:27:21PM -0800, Eric Biggers wrote:
> > > From: Eric Biggers <ebiggers@xxxxxxxxxx>
> > >
> > > There's no need for the ubifs_crypt_is_encrypted() function anymore.
> > > Just use IS_ENCRYPTED() instead, like ext4 and f2fs do.  IS_ENCRYPTED()
> > > checks the VFS-level flag instead of the UBIFS-specific flag, but it
> > > shouldn't change any behavior since the flags are kept in sync.
> > >
> > > Signed-off-by: Eric Biggers <ebiggers@xxxxxxxxxx>
> > > ---
> > >  fs/ubifs/dir.c     | 8 ++++----
> > >  fs/ubifs/file.c    | 4 ++--
> > >  fs/ubifs/journal.c | 6 +++---
> > >  fs/ubifs/ubifs.h   | 7 -------
> > >  4 files changed, 9 insertions(+), 16 deletions(-)
> >
> > Richard, can you consider applying this to the UBIFS tree for 5.6?
> 
> Sure. I'm back from the x-mas break and start collecting patches.
> 

Ping?  I see the other UBIFS patches I sent in linux-ubifs.git#linux-next,
but not this one.

- Eric

______________________________________________________
Linux MTD discussion mailing list
http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-mtd/