Hi Boris, Boris Brezillon <boris.brezillon@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote on Sat, 12 Oct 2019 11:37:45 +0200: > On Thu, 19 Sep 2019 21:31:13 +0200 > Miquel Raynal <miquel.raynal@xxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > > > Prepare the migration to the generic ECC framework by adding more > > fields to the nand_ecc_props structure which will be used widely to > > describe different kind of ECC properties. > > > > Signed-off-by: Miquel Raynal <miquel.raynal@xxxxxxxxxxx> > > --- > > include/linux/mtd/nand.h | 8 ++++++++ > > 1 file changed, 8 insertions(+) > > > > diff --git a/include/linux/mtd/nand.h b/include/linux/mtd/nand.h > > index 7072f14239e5..11cd7cc81a7a 100644 > > --- a/include/linux/mtd/nand.h > > +++ b/include/linux/mtd/nand.h > > @@ -129,12 +129,20 @@ struct nand_page_io_req { > > > > /** > > * struct nand_ecc_props - NAND ECC properties > > + * @provider: ECC engine provider type > > + * @placement: OOB placement (if relevant) > > + * @algo: ECC algorithm (if relevant) > > * @strength: ECC strength > > * @step_size: Number of bytes per step > > + * @flags: Misc properties > > */ > > struct nand_ecc_props { > > + unsigned int provider; > > + unsigned int placement; > > + unsigned int algo; > > Hm, we should have enums here, and it's better to introduce the > provider/placement/algo definitions along with the fields. Absolutely! Good catch, this is fixed. Thanks, Miquèl ______________________________________________________ Linux MTD discussion mailing list http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-mtd/