On Thu, Jan 9, 2020 at 2:46 PM Esben Haabendal <esben@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > > Hi Han > > See comments/questions below. > > If I understand the purpose of some of your changes correct, you are > fixing the handling of pm usage counter, as it currently is incremented > in gpmi_init() and decremented in gpmi_nand_remove(). I believe that > would be nice to have in a separate patch with an explanation of the > change. > > Han Xu <han.xu@xxxxxxx> writes: > > > fix several issues when system suspend/resume, > > > > - leverage the runtime pm for system suspend/resume > > - enable the clock before register access > > - re-apply timing settings > > - set the proper pinctrl state > > > > Signed-off-by: Han Xu <han.xu@xxxxxxx> > > --- > > drivers/mtd/nand/raw/gpmi-nand/gpmi-nand.c | 59 ++++++++++++++++------ > > 1 file changed, 44 insertions(+), 15 deletions(-) > > > > diff --git a/drivers/mtd/nand/raw/gpmi-nand/gpmi-nand.c b/drivers/mtd/nand/raw/gpmi-nand/gpmi-nand.c > > index 334fe3130285..37437d47ab9a 100644 > > --- a/drivers/mtd/nand/raw/gpmi-nand/gpmi-nand.c > > +++ b/drivers/mtd/nand/raw/gpmi-nand/gpmi-nand.c > > @@ -15,6 +15,7 @@ > > #include <linux/of.h> > > #include <linux/of_device.h> > > #include <linux/pm_runtime.h> > > +#include <linux/pinctrl/consumer.h> > > #include <linux/dma/mxs-dma.h> > > #include "gpmi-nand.h" > > #include "gpmi-regs.h" > > @@ -146,7 +147,11 @@ static int __gpmi_enable_clk(struct gpmi_nand_data *this, bool v) > > static int gpmi_init(struct gpmi_nand_data *this) > > { > > struct resources *r = &this->resources; > > - int ret; > > + int ret = 0; > > I don't see why this is changed, given that ret is unconditionally > assigned in the next line. removed. > > > + > > + ret = pm_runtime_get_sync(this->dev); > > + if (ret < 0) > > + return ret; > > > > ret = gpmi_reset_block(r->gpmi_regs, false); > > if (ret) > > @@ -179,8 +184,10 @@ static int gpmi_init(struct gpmi_nand_data *this) > > */ > > writel(BM_GPMI_CTRL1_DECOUPLE_CS, r->gpmi_regs + HW_GPMI_CTRL1_SET); > > > > - return 0; > > Please provide an explanation of the reasoning of this change is. I prefer to pair all runtime ops in same function, get_sync before register access and put after that, in all cases. > > > err_out: > > + pm_runtime_mark_last_busy(this->dev); > > + pm_runtime_put_autosuspend(this->dev); > > + > > return ret; > > } > > > > @@ -528,7 +535,7 @@ static int common_nfc_set_geometry(struct gpmi_nand_data *this) > > static int bch_set_geometry(struct gpmi_nand_data *this) > > { > > struct resources *r = &this->resources; > > - int ret; > > + int ret = 0; > > I don't see any reason for this change. removed > > > ret = common_nfc_set_geometry(this); > > if (ret) > > @@ -2676,7 +2682,7 @@ static int gpmi_nand_probe(struct platform_device *pdev) > > return 0; > > > > exit_nfc_init: > > - pm_runtime_put(&pdev->dev); > > I guess this is because of the change above that causes usage counter > not to be incremented in gpmi_init() when it is successful. > > > + pm_runtime_dont_use_autosuspend(&pdev->dev); > > Is this required before pm_runtime_disable()? If probe function failed before runtime timeout, for instance, the NAND chip not mounted, the runtime suspend won't be called without this change. > > > pm_runtime_disable(&pdev->dev); > > release_resources(this); > > exit_acquire_resources: > > @@ -2688,7 +2694,6 @@ static int gpmi_nand_remove(struct platform_device *pdev) > > { > > struct gpmi_nand_data *this = platform_get_drvdata(pdev); > > > > - pm_runtime_put_sync(&pdev->dev); > > Should be covered by explanation of the change in gpmi_init(). > > > pm_runtime_disable(&pdev->dev); > > > > nand_release(&this->nand); > > @@ -2700,10 +2705,12 @@ static int gpmi_nand_remove(struct platform_device *pdev) > > #ifdef CONFIG_PM_SLEEP > > static int gpmi_pm_suspend(struct device *dev) > > { > > - struct gpmi_nand_data *this = dev_get_drvdata(dev); > > + int ret; > > > > - release_dma_channels(this); > > - return 0; > > + pinctrl_pm_select_sleep_state(dev); > > + ret = pm_runtime_force_suspend(dev); > > + > > + return ret; > > } > > > > static int gpmi_pm_resume(struct device *dev) > > @@ -2711,9 +2718,13 @@ static int gpmi_pm_resume(struct device *dev) > > struct gpmi_nand_data *this = dev_get_drvdata(dev); > > int ret; > > > > - ret = acquire_dma_channels(this); > > - if (ret < 0) > > + ret = pm_runtime_force_resume(dev); > > + if (ret) { > > + dev_err(this->dev, "Error in resume %d\n", ret); > > return ret; > > + } > > + > > + pinctrl_pm_select_default_state(dev); > > > > /* re-init the GPMI registers */ > > ret = gpmi_init(this); > > @@ -2729,22 +2740,40 @@ static int gpmi_pm_resume(struct device *dev) > > return ret; > > } > > > > + /* re-apply the timing setting */ > > + this->hw.must_apply_timings = true; > > + > > return 0; > > } > > #endif /* CONFIG_PM_SLEEP */ > > > > -static int __maybe_unused gpmi_runtime_suspend(struct device *dev) > > +#define gpmi_enable_clk(x) __gpmi_enable_clk(x, true) > > +#define gpmi_disable_clk(x) __gpmi_enable_clk(x, false) > > + > > +static int gpmi_runtime_suspend(struct device *dev) > > { > > struct gpmi_nand_data *this = dev_get_drvdata(dev); > > > > - return __gpmi_enable_clk(this, false); > > + gpmi_disable_clk(this); > > + release_dma_channels(this); > > + > > + return 0; > > } > > > > -static int __maybe_unused gpmi_runtime_resume(struct device *dev) > > +static int gpmi_runtime_resume(struct device *dev) > > { > > struct gpmi_nand_data *this = dev_get_drvdata(dev); > > + int ret; > > > > - return __gpmi_enable_clk(this, true); > > + ret = gpmi_enable_clk(this); > > + if (ret) > > + return ret; > > + > > + ret = acquire_dma_channels(this); > > + if (ret < 0) > > + return ret; > > + > > + return 0; > > } > > > > static const struct dev_pm_ops gpmi_pm_ops = { > > ______________________________________________________ > Linux MTD discussion mailing list > http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-mtd/ -- Sincerely, Han XU ______________________________________________________ Linux MTD discussion mailing list http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-mtd/