Re: [PATCH 11/16] dt-bindings: atmel,at91rm9200-rtc: add microchip,sam9x60-rtc

[<Claudiu.Beznea@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>]

On 10.01.2020 16:30, Alexandre Belloni wrote:
> EXTERNAL EMAIL: Do not click links or open attachments unless you know the content is safe
> 
> Hi,
> 
> On 08/01/2020 14:55:18+0200, Claudiu Beznea wrote:
>> Add microchip,sam9x60-rtc to DT bindings documentation.
> 
> This will have to be rebased on top of
> https://lore.kernel.org/linux-rtc/20191229204421.337612-2-alexandre.belloni@xxxxxxxxxxx/

This is also not integrated in latest next. Will this postpone the
acceptance of the device tree, until the yaml conversion is accepted?

> 
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Claudiu Beznea <claudiu.beznea@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
>> ---
>>  Documentation/devicetree/bindings/rtc/atmel,at91rm9200-rtc.txt | 3 ++-
>>  1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
>>
>> diff --git a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/rtc/atmel,at91rm9200-rtc.txt b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/rtc/atmel,at91rm9200-rtc.txt
>> index 5d3791e789c6..35eab9138d0b 100644
>> --- a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/rtc/atmel,at91rm9200-rtc.txt
>> +++ b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/rtc/atmel,at91rm9200-rtc.txt
>> @@ -1,7 +1,8 @@
>>  Atmel AT91RM9200 Real Time Clock
>>
>>  Required properties:
>> -- compatible: should be: "atmel,at91rm9200-rtc" or "atmel,at91sam9x5-rtc"
>> +- compatible: should be: "atmel,at91rm9200-rtc", "atmel,at91sam9x5-rtc" or
>> +  "microchip,sam9x60-rtc"
>>  - reg: physical base address of the controller and length of memory mapped
>>    region.
>>  - interrupts: rtc alarm/event interrupt
>> --
>> 2.7.4
>>
> 
> --
> Alexandre Belloni, Bootlin
> Embedded Linux and Kernel engineering
> https://bootlin.com
> 
______________________________________________________
Linux MTD discussion mailing list
http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-mtd/