Re: [PATCH 03/16] dt-bindings: atmel-tcb: add microchip,<chip>-tcb

[<Claudiu.Beznea@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>]

On 10.01.2020 15:40, Alexandre Belloni wrote:
> EXTERNAL EMAIL: Do not click links or open attachments unless you know the content is safe
> 
> On 08/01/2020 14:55:10+0200, Claudiu Beznea wrote:
>> Add microchip,<chip>-tcb to DT bindings documentation. This is for
>> microchip,sam9x60-tcb.
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Claudiu Beznea <claudiu.beznea@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
>> ---
>>  Documentation/devicetree/bindings/mfd/atmel-tcb.txt | 5 +++--
>>  1 file changed, 3 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
>>
>> diff --git a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/mfd/atmel-tcb.txt b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/mfd/atmel-tcb.txt
>> index c4a83e364cb6..e1713e41f6e0 100644
>> --- a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/mfd/atmel-tcb.txt
>> +++ b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/mfd/atmel-tcb.txt
>> @@ -1,6 +1,7 @@
>>  * Device tree bindings for Atmel Timer Counter Blocks
>> -- compatible: Should be "atmel,<chip>-tcb", "simple-mfd", "syscon".
>> -  <chip> can be "at91rm9200" or "at91sam9x5"
>> +- compatible: Should be "atmel,<chip>-tcb", "microchip,<chip>-tcb",
>> +  "simple-mfd", "syscon".
>> +  <chip> can be "at91rm9200", "at91sam9x5" or "sam9x60"
> 
> atmel,sam9x60-tcb, microchip,at91rm9200-tcb and microchip,at91sam9x5-tcb
> are not allowed and the documentation should reflect that.

OK! I'll double check it.

> 
> It would probably be easier to do that on top of the yaml conversion
> here:
> https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/20191009224006.5021-2-alexandre.belloni@xxxxxxxxxxx/

I don't see this integrated in next-20200110. Am I looking at the wrong branch?

> 
> --
> Alexandre Belloni, Bootlin
> Embedded Linux and Kernel engineering
> https://bootlin.com
> 
______________________________________________________
Linux MTD discussion mailing list
http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-mtd/