Hi Mason, Mason Yang <masonccyang@xxxxxxxxxxx> wrote on Thu, 24 Oct 2019 15:40:06 +0800: > Macronix NANDs support randomizer operation for user data scrambled, > which can be enabled with a SET_FEATURE. > > User data written to the NAND device without randomizer is still readable > after randomizer function enabled. > The penalty of randomizer are subpage accesses prohibited and more time > period is needed in program operation and entering deep power-down mode. > i.e., tPROG 300us to 340us(randomizer enabled) > > For more high-reliability concern, if subpage write not available with > hardware ECC and then to enable randomizer is recommended by default. > Driver checks byte 167 of Vendor Blocks in ONFI parameter page table > to see if this high-reliability function is supported. By adding a new > specific DT property in children nodes to enable randomizer function. > > Signed-off-by: Mason Yang <masonccyang@xxxxxxxxxxx> > --- > drivers/mtd/nand/raw/nand_macronix.c | 69 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++ > 1 file changed, 69 insertions(+) > > diff --git a/drivers/mtd/nand/raw/nand_macronix.c b/drivers/mtd/nand/raw/nand_macronix.c > index 58511ae..89101fa 100644 > --- a/drivers/mtd/nand/raw/nand_macronix.c > +++ b/drivers/mtd/nand/raw/nand_macronix.c > @@ -11,6 +11,14 @@ > #define MACRONIX_READ_RETRY_BIT BIT(0) > #define MACRONIX_NUM_READ_RETRY_MODES 6 > > +#define MACRONIX_RANDOMIZER_BIT BIT(1) > +#define ONFI_FEATURE_ADDR_MXIC_RANDOMIZER 0xB0 > +#define ENPGM BIT(0) > +#define RANDEN BIT(1) > +#define RANDOPT BIT(2) > +#define MACRONIX_RANDOMIZER_MODE_ENTER (ENPGM | RANDEN | RANDOPT) > +#define MACRONIX_RANDOMIZER_MODE_EXIT (RANDEN | RANDOPT) > + > struct nand_onfi_vendor_macronix { > u8 reserved; > u8 reliability_func; > @@ -29,15 +37,76 @@ static int macronix_nand_setup_read_retry(struct nand_chip *chip, int mode) > return nand_set_features(chip, ONFI_FEATURE_ADDR_READ_RETRY, feature); > } > > +static int macronix_nand_randomizer_check_enable(struct nand_chip *chip) > +{ > + u8 feature[ONFI_SUBFEATURE_PARAM_LEN]; > + int ret; > + > + ret = nand_get_features(chip, ONFI_FEATURE_ADDR_MXIC_RANDOMIZER, > + feature); > + if (ret < 0) > + return ret; > + > + if (feature[0]) > + return feature[0]; > + > + feature[0] = MACRONIX_RANDOMIZER_MODE_ENTER; > + ret = nand_set_features(chip, ONFI_FEATURE_ADDR_MXIC_RANDOMIZER, > + feature); > + if (ret < 0) > + return ret; > + > + /* RANDEN and RANDOPT OTP bits are programmed */ > + feature[0] = 0x0; > + ret = nand_prog_page_op(chip, 0, 0, feature, 1); > + if (ret < 0) > + return ret; > + > + ret = nand_get_features(chip, ONFI_FEATURE_ADDR_MXIC_RANDOMIZER, > + feature); > + if (ret < 0) > + return ret; > + > + feature[0] &= MACRONIX_RANDOMIZER_MODE_EXIT; > + ret = nand_set_features(chip, ONFI_FEATURE_ADDR_MXIC_RANDOMIZER, > + feature); > + if (ret < 0) > + return ret; > + > + return feature[0]; Can feature[0] be != 0 ? I don't think so, in this case I prefer a: return 0; > +} > + > static void macronix_nand_onfi_init(struct nand_chip *chip) > { > struct nand_parameters *p = &chip->parameters; > struct nand_onfi_vendor_macronix *mxic; > + struct device_node *dn = nand_get_flash_node(chip); > + int rand_otp = 0; > + int ret; > > if (!p->onfi) > return; > > + if (of_find_property(dn, "mxic,enable-randomizer-otp", NULL)) > + rand_otp = 1; > + > mxic = (struct nand_onfi_vendor_macronix *)p->onfi->vendor; > + /* Subpage write is prohibited in randomizer operatoin */ with operation > + if (rand_otp && chip->options & NAND_NO_SUBPAGE_WRITE && > + mxic->reliability_func & MACRONIX_RANDOMIZER_BIT) { > + if (p->supports_set_get_features) { > + bitmap_set(p->set_feature_list, > + ONFI_FEATURE_ADDR_MXIC_RANDOMIZER, 1); > + bitmap_set(p->get_feature_list, > + ONFI_FEATURE_ADDR_MXIC_RANDOMIZER, 1); > + ret = macronix_nand_randomizer_check_enable(chip); > + if (ret < 0) > + pr_info("Macronix NAND randomizer failed\n"); > + else > + pr_info("Macronix NAND randomizer enabled\n"); Maybe we should update the bitmaps only if it succeeds? > + } > + } > + > if ((mxic->reliability_func & MACRONIX_READ_RETRY_BIT) == 0) > return; > With the above fixed, Reviewed-by: Miquel Raynal <miquel.raynal@xxxxxxxxxxx> Thanks, Miquèl ______________________________________________________ Linux MTD discussion mailing list http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-mtd/