On Mon, Dec 30, 2019 at 12:32 PM Ezequiel Garcia <ezequiel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > Hello Emil, Patrick, Richard: > > What we _could_ do, is extend the current syntax, passing > a format string to the kernel. Something like this, provided > a ubi0_0 volume, named "rootA". > > ubi.block=0,0,ubiblock${dev.id}_${vol.id} > > would create block device as "/dev/ubiblock0_0". > > Where as, ubi.block=0,0,ubiblock${dev.id}${vol.name} > > would create block device as "/dev/ubiblock0_rootA". > Does this make any sense... or it is pure insanity? That would work for me... as it is... the first project where I needed this got shelved, and the second one grew an initramfs so I no longer need the patch. I would be happy to see others benefit from it, or from some other, better mechanism. --wpd ______________________________________________________ Linux MTD discussion mailing list http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-mtd/