Hi Masahiro, On Tue, 2019-12-10 at 18:14 +0900, Masahiro Yamada wrote: > According to the Denali User's Guide, this IP has two reset signals. > > rst_n: reset most of FFs in the controller core > reg_rst_n: reset all FFs in the register interface, and in the > initialization sequence > > This commit supports controlling those reset signals, although they > might be often tied up together in actual SoC integration. > > One thing that should be kept in mind is the automated initialization > sequence (a.k.a. 'bootstrap' process) is kicked off when reg_rst_n is > deasserted. > > When the reset is deasserted, the controller issues a RESET command > to the chip select 0, and attempts to read out the chip ID, and further > more, ONFI parameters if it is an ONFI-compliant device. Then, the > controller sets up the relevant registers based on the detected > device parameters. > > This process is just redundant for Linux because nand_scan_ident() > probes devices and sets up parameters accordingly. Rather, this hardware > feature is annoying because it ends up with misdetection due to bugs. > > So, commit 0615e7ad5d52 ("mtd: nand: denali: remove Toshiba and Hynix > specific fixup code") changed the driver to not rely on it. > > However, there is no way to prevent it from running. The IP provides > the 'bootstrap_inhibit_init' port to suppress this sequence, but it is > usually out of software control, and dependent on SoC implementation. > As for the Socionext UniPhier platform, LD4 always enables it. For the > later SoCs, the bootstrap sequence runs depending on the boot mode. > > I added usleep_range() to make the driver wait until the sequence > finishes. Otherwise, the driver would fail to detect the chip due > to the race between the driver and hardware-controlled sequence. > > Signed-off-by: Masahiro Yamada <yamada.masahiro@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> > --- > > .../devicetree/bindings/mtd/denali-nand.txt | 7 ++++ > drivers/mtd/nand/raw/denali_dt.c | 40 ++++++++++++++++++- > 2 files changed, 46 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-) > > diff --git a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/mtd/denali-nand.txt b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/mtd/denali-nand.txt > index b32aed1db46d..a48b17fb969a 100644 > --- a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/mtd/denali-nand.txt > +++ b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/mtd/denali-nand.txt > @@ -14,6 +14,11 @@ Required properties: > interface clock, and the ECC circuit clock. > - clock-names: should contain "nand", "nand_x", "ecc" > > +Optional properties: > + - resets: may contain phandles to the controller core reset, the register > + reset > + - reset-names: may contain "nand", "reg" > + > Sub-nodes: > Sub-nodes represent available NAND chips. > > @@ -46,6 +51,8 @@ nand: nand@ff900000 { > reg-names = "nand_data", "denali_reg"; > clocks = <&nand_clk>, <&nand_x_clk>, <&nand_ecc_clk>; > clock-names = "nand", "nand_x", "ecc"; > + resets = <&nand_rst>, <&nand_reg_rst>; > + reset-names = "nand", "reg"; > interrupts = <0 144 4>; > > nand@0 { According to Documentation/devicetree/bindings/submitting-patches.txt this part should be a separate patch. > diff --git a/drivers/mtd/nand/raw/denali_dt.c b/drivers/mtd/nand/raw/denali_dt.c > index 8b779a899dcf..132bc6cc066c 100644 > --- a/drivers/mtd/nand/raw/denali_dt.c > +++ b/drivers/mtd/nand/raw/denali_dt.c > @@ -6,6 +6,7 @@ > */ > > #include <linux/clk.h> > +#include <linux/delay.h> > #include <linux/err.h> > #include <linux/io.h> > #include <linux/ioport.h> > @@ -14,6 +15,7 @@ > #include <linux/of.h> > #include <linux/of_device.h> > #include <linux/platform_device.h> > +#include <linux/reset.h> > > #include "denali.h" > > @@ -22,6 +24,8 @@ struct denali_dt { > struct clk *clk; /* core clock */ > struct clk *clk_x; /* bus interface clock */ > struct clk *clk_ecc; /* ECC circuit clock */ > + struct reset_control *rst; /* core reset */ > + struct reset_control *rst_reg; /* register reset */ > }; > > struct denali_dt_data { > @@ -151,6 +155,14 @@ static int denali_dt_probe(struct platform_device *pdev) > if (IS_ERR(dt->clk_ecc)) > return PTR_ERR(dt->clk_ecc); > > + dt->rst = devm_reset_control_get_optional_shared(dev, "nand"); > + if (IS_ERR(dt->rst)) > + return PTR_ERR(dt->rst); > + > + dt->rst_reg = devm_reset_control_get_optional_shared(dev, "reg"); > + if (IS_ERR(dt->rst_reg)) > + return PTR_ERR(dt->rst_reg); > + > ret = clk_prepare_enable(dt->clk); > if (ret) > return ret; > @@ -166,10 +178,30 @@ static int denali_dt_probe(struct platform_device *pdev) > denali->clk_rate = clk_get_rate(dt->clk); > denali->clk_x_rate = clk_get_rate(dt->clk_x); > > - ret = denali_init(denali); > + /* > + * Deassert the register reset, and the core reset in this order. > + * Deasserting the core reset while the register reset is asserted > + * will cause unpredictable behavior in the controller. > + */ > + ret = reset_control_deassert(dt->rst_reg); > if (ret) > goto out_disable_clk_ecc; > > + ret = reset_control_deassert(dt->rst); > + if (ret) > + goto out_assert_rst_reg; > + > + /* > + * When the reset is deasserted, the initialization sequence is kicked > + * (bootstrap process). This will take a while, and the driver must > + * wait until it finished in order to avoid unpredictable behavior. > + */ > + usleep_range(200, 1000); > + > + ret = denali_init(denali); > + if (ret) > + goto out_assert_rst; > + > for_each_child_of_node(dev->of_node, np) { > ret = denali_dt_chip_init(denali, np); > if (ret) { > @@ -184,6 +216,10 @@ static int denali_dt_probe(struct platform_device *pdev) > > out_remove_denali: > denali_remove(denali); > +out_assert_rst: > + reset_control_assert(dt->rst); > +out_assert_rst_reg: > + reset_control_assert(dt->rst_reg); > out_disable_clk_ecc: > clk_disable_unprepare(dt->clk_ecc); > out_disable_clk_x: > @@ -199,6 +235,8 @@ static int denali_dt_remove(struct platform_device *pdev) > struct denali_dt *dt = platform_get_drvdata(pdev); > > denali_remove(&dt->controller); > + reset_control_assert(dt->rst); > + reset_control_assert(dt->rst_reg); > clk_disable_unprepare(dt->clk_ecc); > clk_disable_unprepare(dt->clk_x); > clk_disable_unprepare(dt->clk); Reviewed-by: Philipp Zabel <p.zabel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> for the driver part. regards Philipp ______________________________________________________ Linux MTD discussion mailing list http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-mtd/