On 04/12/19 3:47 pm, Miquel Raynal wrote: > Hi Vignesh, > > Vignesh Raghavendra <vigneshr@xxxxxx> wrote on Wed, 4 Dec 2019 15:28:46 > +0530: > [...] >> IIUC flash0 and flash1 are subnodes of a SPI master node? >> And I believe flash0 node's compatible is "jedec,spi-nor"? > > Indeed this is one possibility (probably the most common) but in theory > this should work for any kind of MTD device, hence I voluntarily > dropped the hardware-specific properties to focus on the partitions > description here. > Ah, make sense... >> >> >>> >>> flash1 { >>> partitions { >>> compatible = "fixed-partitions"; >>> >>> flash0_part1: part1@0 { >> >> s/flash0_part1/flash1_part0? > > Right! > >> >>> label = "part1_0"; >>> reg = <0x0 0x800000>; >>> }; >>> >>> part0@800000 { >>> label = "part1_1"; >>> reg = <0x800000 0x800000>; >>> }; >>> }; >>> }; >>> >> >> For my understanding, how many /dev/mtdX entries would this create? > > If the master is retained (Kconfig option) and thanks to the common > partitioning scheme, we would have: > * flash0 (mtd0) > * part0_0 (mtd1) > * part0_1 (mtd2) > * flash1 (mtd3) > * part1_0 (mtd4) > * part1_1 (mtd5) > > If we enable this driver, we would also get an additional device: > * mtd2-mtd4-concat (or part0_1-part1_0-concat, I don't recall the exact > name) being mtd6. Ok, thanks for the clarification! -- Regards Vignesh ______________________________________________________ Linux MTD discussion mailing list http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-mtd/