On Mon, Nov 11, 2019 at 05:34:46PM +0100, Jan Kara wrote: > Hi Sascha! > > On Mon 11-11-19 09:57:45, Sascha Hauer wrote: > > On Wed, Nov 06, 2019 at 11:14:28AM +0100, Jan Kara wrote: > > > > +/** > > > > + * ubifs_dqblk_find_next - find the next qid > > > > + * @c: UBIFS file-system description object > > > > + * @qid: The qid to look for > > > > + * > > > > + * Find the next dqblk entry with a qid that is bigger or equally big than the > > > > + * given qid. Returns the next dqblk entry if found or NULL if no dqblk exists > > > > + * with a qid that is at least equally big. > > > > + */ > > > > +static struct ubifs_dqblk *ubifs_dqblk_find_next(struct ubifs_info *c, > > > > + struct kqid qid) > > > > +{ > > > > + struct rb_node *node = c->dqblk_tree[qid.type].rb_node; > > > > + struct ubifs_dqblk *next = NULL; > > > > + > > > > + while (node) { > > > > + struct ubifs_dqblk *ud = rb_entry(node, struct ubifs_dqblk, rb); > > > > + > > > > + if (qid_eq(qid, ud->kqid)) > > > > + return ud; > > > > + > > > > + if (qid_lt(qid, ud->kqid)) { > > > > + if (!next || qid_lt(ud->kqid, next->kqid)) > ^^^ > This condition looks superfluous as it should be always true. The last node > where you went left should be the least greater node if you didn't find the > exact match... You are right. I can't say why I thought this is necessary when I wrote this. > > > > > + next = ud; > > > > + > > > > + node = node->rb_left; > > > > + } else { > > > > + node = node->rb_right; > > > > + } > > > > + } > > > > + > > > > + return next; > > > > +} > > > > > > Why not use rb_next() here? It should do what you need, shouldn't it? > > > > I could use rb_next(), but it defeats the purpose of a tree to iterate > > over the whole tree to find an entry. If I wanted that I would have used > > a list. > > I wasn't quite clear in my suggestion and now that I look at it it was > actually misleading. I'm sorry for that. So a second try :): > > You have ubifs_dqblk_find() and ubifs_dqblk_find_next() doing very similar > rbtree traversal. I think you could remove that duplication by using > ubifs_dqblk_find_next() from ubifs_dqblk_find()? Ok, with this the two functions can be simplified to: /** * ubifs_dqblk_find_next - find the next qid * @c: UBIFS file-system description object * @qid: The qid to look for * * Find the next dqblk entry with a qid that is bigger or equally big than the * given qid. Returns the next dqblk entry if found or NULL if no dqblk exists * with a qid that is at least equally big. */ static struct ubifs_dqblk *ubifs_dqblk_find_next(struct ubifs_info *c, struct kqid qid) { struct rb_node *node = c->dqblk_tree[qid.type].rb_node; struct ubifs_dqblk *next = NULL; while (node) { struct ubifs_dqblk *ud = rb_entry(node, struct ubifs_dqblk, rb); if (qid_eq(qid, ud->kqid)) return ud; if (qid_lt(qid, ud->kqid)) { next = ud; node = node->rb_left; } else { node = node->rb_right; } } return next; } /** * ubifs_dqblk_find - find qid in tree * @c: UBIFS file-system description object * @qid: The qid to look for * * This walks the dqblk tree and searches a given qid. Returns the dqblk entry * when found or NULL otherwise. */ static struct ubifs_dqblk *ubifs_dqblk_find(struct ubifs_info *c, struct kqid qid) { struct ubifs_dqblk *next = NULL; next = ubifs_dqblk_find_next(c, qid); if (next && qid_eq(qid, next->kqid)) return next; return NULL; } If this looks good now I'll integrate it for the next round. I'll delay sending a new version until Richard has had a look into this series. Sascha -- Pengutronix e.K. | | Steuerwalder Str. 21 | http://www.pengutronix.de/ | 31137 Hildesheim, Germany | Phone: +49-5121-206917-0 | Amtsgericht Hildesheim, HRA 2686 | Fax: +49-5121-206917-5555 | ______________________________________________________ Linux MTD discussion mailing list http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-mtd/