On Tue, Oct 29, 2019 at 09:14:33AM +0000, Russell King - ARM Linux admin wrote: > On Tue, Oct 29, 2019 at 08:51:42AM +0530, Saurav Girepunje wrote: > > Return type for security_extensions_enabled() is bool > > so use true/false. > > This doesn't seem to bear any resemblence to the subject line. > > > Signed-off-by: Saurav Girepunje <saurav.girepunje@xxxxxxxxx> > > --- > > arch/arm/mm/nommu.c | 2 +- > > drivers/mtd/devices/phram.c | 11 +++++------ > > 2 files changed, 6 insertions(+), 7 deletions(-) > > > > diff --git a/arch/arm/mm/nommu.c b/arch/arm/mm/nommu.c > > index 24ecf8d30a1e..1fed74f93c66 100644 > > --- a/arch/arm/mm/nommu.c > > +++ b/arch/arm/mm/nommu.c > > @@ -56,7 +56,7 @@ static inline bool security_extensions_enabled(void) > > if ((read_cpuid_id() & 0x000f0000) == 0x000f0000) > > return cpuid_feature_extract(CPUID_EXT_PFR1, 4) || > > cpuid_feature_extract(CPUID_EXT_PFR1, 20); > > - return 0; > > + return true; > > This isn't explained in the commit. You explain why it should return > true or false, but you don't explain why converting this from returning > 0, aka false, to returning true is necessary. > > > } > > > > unsigned long setup_vectors_base(void) > > diff --git a/drivers/mtd/devices/phram.c b/drivers/mtd/devices/phram.c > > index 86ae13b756b5..931e5c2481b5 100644 > > --- a/drivers/mtd/devices/phram.c > > +++ b/drivers/mtd/devices/phram.c > > @@ -239,27 +239,26 @@ static int phram_setup(const char *val) > > > > ret = parse_name(&name, token[0]); > > if (ret) > > - goto exit; > > + return ret; > > > > ret = parse_num64(&start, token[1]); > > if (ret) { > > + kfree(name); > > parse_err("illegal start address\n"); > > - goto parse_err; > > } > > > > ret = parse_num64(&len, token[2]); > > if (ret) { > > + kfree(name); > > parse_err("illegal device length\n"); > > - goto parse_err; > > } > > > > ret = register_device(name, start, len); > > if (!ret) > > pr_info("%s device: %#llx at %#llx\n", name, len, start); > > + else > > + kfree(name); > > > > -parse_err: > > - kfree(name); > > -exit: > > return ret; > > } > > At least this partially matches the subject line but it looks unrelated > to the other changes. > > -- > RMK's Patch system: https://www.armlinux.org.uk/developer/patches/ > FTTC broadband for 0.8mile line in suburbia: sync at 12.1Mbps down 622kbps up > According to speedtest.net: 11.9Mbps down 500kbps up Please igonre this patch. Suppose to send for only one file nommu.c. I have seperated and submitted the patch for chnages in file phram.c and nommu.c. Thanks for review ... :-) ______________________________________________________ Linux MTD discussion mailing list http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-mtd/