On Wed, 23 Oct 2019 23:39:31 +0000 <Tudor.Ambarus@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > On 10/10/2019 10:21 AM, Boris Brezillon wrote: > > External E-Mail > > > > > > On Tue, 24 Sep 2019 07:46:18 +0000 > > <Tudor.Ambarus@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > > > >> From: Tudor Ambarus <tudor.ambarus@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> > >> > >> static int write_enable(struct spi_nor *nor) > >> static int write_disable(struct spi_nor *nor) > >> become > >> static int spi_nor_write_enable(struct spi_nor *nor) > >> static int spi_nor_write_disable(struct spi_nor *nor) > >> > >> Check for errors after each call to them. Move them up in the > >> file as the first SPI NOR Register Operations, to avoid further > >> forward declarations. > > > > Same here, split that in 3 patches please. In order to keep the number of patch in this series small, I'd recommend doing all spi_nor_ prefixing in a patch, all function moves in another one and all error checking in a third patch, instead of splitting it per-function. ______________________________________________________ Linux MTD discussion mailing list http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-mtd/