Re: [PATCH RFC 2/3] mtd: rawnand: Add support Macronix Block Protection function

[masonccyang@xxxxxxxxxxx]

Hi Miquel,

> > > > 
> > > > > Macronix AC series support using SET/GET_FEATURES to change
> > > > > Block Protection and Unprotection.
> > > > > 
> > > > > MTD default _lock/_unlock function replacement by manufacturer
> > > > > postponed initialization. 
> > > > 
> > > > Why would we do that?
> > > > 
> > > > Anyway your solution looks overkill, if we ever decide to
> > > > implement these hooks for raw nand, it is better just to not
> > > > overwrite them in nand_scan_tail() if they have been filled
> > > > previously (ie. by the manufacturer code). 
> > > 
> > > Actually you should add two NAND hooks that do the interface with 
the
> > > MTD hooks. In the NAND hooks, check that the request is to lock all 
the
> > > device, otherwise return -ENOTSUPP. 
> > 
> > sorry, can't get your point.
> > 
> > Because the NAND entire chip will be protected if PT(protection) pin 
> > is active high at power-on.
> 
> In your implementation of the locking, you should check that the
> locking request is over the entire device, unless you can lock a
> smaller portion of course.

yes, I can lock a smaller portion.
And at the power-on of device with PT pin at high voltage, all blocks are 
locked.
They have to be unlocked by set feature command.

> 
> > 
> > > 
> > > Then fill-in these two hooks from the manufacturer code, without the
> > > postponed init.
> > > 
> > 
> > But in the final of nand_scan_tail(), mtd->_lock/_unlock will be
> > filled by NULL, right ?
> 
> The NAND core should set mtd->_lock/_unlock() to NAND specific hooks so
> that the MTD layer is abstracted and and drivers do not see it. Then,
> in the NAND helper, either there is no specific hook defined by a
> manufacturer driver and you return -ENOTSUPP, or you execute the
> defined hook.

okay, patch specific manufacturer _lock/_unlock driver
in nand_manufacturer_init();

and in the final of nand_scan_tail()
if (!mtd->_lock)
        mtd->_lock = NULL;
if (!mtd->_unlock)
        mtd->_unlock = NULL;

thanks for your time and comments.
Mason

CONFIDENTIALITY NOTE:

This e-mail and any attachments may contain confidential information 
and/or personal data, which is protected by applicable laws. Please be 
reminded that duplication, disclosure, distribution, or use of this e-mail 
(and/or its attachments) or any part thereof is prohibited. If you receive 
this e-mail in error, please notify us immediately and delete this mail as 
well as its attachment(s) from your system. In addition, please be 
informed that collection, processing, and/or use of personal data is 
prohibited unless expressly permitted by personal data protection laws. 
Thank you for your attention and cooperation.

Macronix International Co., Ltd.

=====================================================================



============================================================================

CONFIDENTIALITY NOTE:

This e-mail and any attachments may contain confidential information and/or personal data, which is protected by applicable laws. Please be reminded that duplication, disclosure, distribution, or use of this e-mail (and/or its attachments) or any part thereof is prohibited. If you receive this e-mail in error, please notify us immediately and delete this mail as well as its attachment(s) from your system. In addition, please be informed that collection, processing, and/or use of personal data is prohibited unless expressly permitted by personal data protection laws. Thank you for your attention and cooperation.

Macronix International Co., Ltd.

=====================================================================


______________________________________________________
Linux MTD discussion mailing list
http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-mtd/