Re: [PATCH v2 10/22] mtd: spi-nor: Rework write_sr()

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On 24/09/2019 08:46, Tudor.Ambarus@xxxxxxxxxxxxx wrote:
+}
+
+/**
+ * spi_nor_write_sr() - Write the Status Register.
+ * @nor:	pointer to 'struct spi_nor'.
+ * @sr:		buffer to write to the Status Register.
+ * @len:	number of bytes to write to the Status Register.
+ *
+ * Return: 0 on success, -errno otherwise.
  */
-static int write_sr(struct spi_nor *nor, u8 val)
+static int spi_nor_write_sr(struct spi_nor *nor, const u8 *sr, size_t len)
 {
-	nor->bouncebuf[0] = val;
+	int ret;
+
+	ret = spi_nor_write_enable(nor);
+	if (ret)
+		return ret;
+

Hi Tudor,

 	if (nor->spimem) {
 		struct spi_mem_op op =
 			SPI_MEM_OP(SPI_MEM_OP_CMD(SPINOR_OP_WRSR, 1),
 				   SPI_MEM_OP_NO_ADDR,
 				   SPI_MEM_OP_NO_DUMMY,
-				   SPI_MEM_OP_DATA_IN(1, nor->bouncebuf, 1));

This be SPI_MEM_OP_DATA_OUT() in the current mainline code also, right?

I'm testing my under development driver on top of v5.4-rc1, and flash_lock -u is broken.

Cheers,
John

+				   SPI_MEM_OP_DATA_OUT(len, sr, 1));

-		return spi_mem_exec_op(nor->spimem, &op);
+		ret = spi_mem_exec_op(nor->spimem, &op);
+	} else {
+		ret = nor->controller_ops->write_reg(nor, SPINOR_OP_WRSR,
+						     sr, len);
 	}

-	return nor->controller_ops->write_reg(nor, SPINOR_OP_WRSR,
-					      nor->bouncebuf, 1);
+	if (ret) {
+		dev_err(nor->dev, "error while writing Status Register\n");
+		return ret;
+	}
+
+	ret = spi_nor_wait_till_ready(nor);
+
+	return ret;
 }

 static struct spi_nor *mtd_to_spi_nor(struct mtd_info *mtd)
@@ -741,161 +914,6 @@ static int winbond_set_4byte(struct spi_nor *nor, bool enable)
 	return ret;
 }



______________________________________________________
Linux MTD discussion mailing list
http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-mtd/



[Index of Archives]     [LARTC]     [Bugtraq]     [Yosemite Forum]     [Photo]

  Powered by Linux