On 24/09/2019 08:46, Tudor.Ambarus@xxxxxxxxxxxxx wrote:
+}
+
+/**
+ * spi_nor_write_sr() - Write the Status Register.
+ * @nor: pointer to 'struct spi_nor'.
+ * @sr: buffer to write to the Status Register.
+ * @len: number of bytes to write to the Status Register.
+ *
+ * Return: 0 on success, -errno otherwise.
*/
-static int write_sr(struct spi_nor *nor, u8 val)
+static int spi_nor_write_sr(struct spi_nor *nor, const u8 *sr, size_t len)
{
- nor->bouncebuf[0] = val;
+ int ret;
+
+ ret = spi_nor_write_enable(nor);
+ if (ret)
+ return ret;
+
Hi Tudor,
if (nor->spimem) {
struct spi_mem_op op =
SPI_MEM_OP(SPI_MEM_OP_CMD(SPINOR_OP_WRSR, 1),
SPI_MEM_OP_NO_ADDR,
SPI_MEM_OP_NO_DUMMY,
- SPI_MEM_OP_DATA_IN(1, nor->bouncebuf, 1));
This be SPI_MEM_OP_DATA_OUT() in the current mainline code also, right?
I'm testing my under development driver on top of v5.4-rc1, and
flash_lock -u is broken.
Cheers,
John
+ SPI_MEM_OP_DATA_OUT(len, sr, 1));
- return spi_mem_exec_op(nor->spimem, &op);
+ ret = spi_mem_exec_op(nor->spimem, &op);
+ } else {
+ ret = nor->controller_ops->write_reg(nor, SPINOR_OP_WRSR,
+ sr, len);
}
- return nor->controller_ops->write_reg(nor, SPINOR_OP_WRSR,
- nor->bouncebuf, 1);
+ if (ret) {
+ dev_err(nor->dev, "error while writing Status Register\n");
+ return ret;
+ }
+
+ ret = spi_nor_wait_till_ready(nor);
+
+ return ret;
}
static struct spi_nor *mtd_to_spi_nor(struct mtd_info *mtd)
@@ -741,161 +914,6 @@ static int winbond_set_4byte(struct spi_nor *nor, bool enable)
return ret;
}
______________________________________________________
Linux MTD discussion mailing list
http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-mtd/