On Mon, Sep 30, 2019 at 12:25 PM Boris Brezillon <boris.brezillon@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > > On Mon, 30 Sep 2019 12:01:28 -0400 > Kamal Dasu <kdasu.kdev@xxxxxxxxx> wrote: > > > Does anyone have any comments on this patch ?. > > > > Kamal > > > > On Fri, Sep 6, 2019 at 3:49 PM Kamal Dasu <kdasu.kdev@xxxxxxxxx> wrote: > > > > > > For controller drivers that use DMA and set NAND_USE_BOUNCE_BUFFER > > > option use data buffers that are not vmalloced, aligned and have > > > valid virtual address to be able to do DMA transfers. This change > > > adds additional check and makes use of data buffer allocated > > > in nand_base driver when it is passed a vmalloced data buffer for > > > DMA transfers. > > > > > > Signed-off-by: Kamal Dasu <kdasu.kdev@xxxxxxxxx> > > > --- > > > drivers/mtd/nand/raw/nand_base.c | 14 ++++++++------ > > > 1 file changed, 8 insertions(+), 6 deletions(-) > > > > > > diff --git a/drivers/mtd/nand/raw/nand_base.c b/drivers/mtd/nand/raw/nand_base.c > > > index 91f046d4d452..46f6965a896a 100644 > > > --- a/drivers/mtd/nand/raw/nand_base.c > > > +++ b/drivers/mtd/nand/raw/nand_base.c > > > @@ -45,6 +45,12 @@ > > > > > > #include "internals.h" > > > > > > +static int nand_need_bounce_buf(const void *buf, struct nand_chip *chip) > > > +{ > > > + return !virt_addr_valid(buf) || is_vmalloc_addr(buf) || > > I thought virt_addr_valid() was implying !is_vmalloc_addr(), are you > sure you need that test, and can you tell me on which arch(es) this is > needed. > This has been observed on MIPS4K and MIPS5K architectures. There is a check on the controller driver to use pio in such cases. > > > + !IS_ALIGNED((unsigned long)buf, chip->buf_align); > > > +} > > > + > > > /* Define default oob placement schemes for large and small page devices */ > > > static int nand_ooblayout_ecc_sp(struct mtd_info *mtd, int section, > > > struct mtd_oob_region *oobregion) > > > @@ -3183,9 +3189,7 @@ static int nand_do_read_ops(struct nand_chip *chip, loff_t from, > > > if (!aligned) > > > use_bufpoi = 1; > > > else if (chip->options & NAND_USE_BOUNCE_BUFFER) > > > - use_bufpoi = !virt_addr_valid(buf) || > > > - !IS_ALIGNED((unsigned long)buf, > > > - chip->buf_align); > > > + use_bufpoi = nand_need_bounce_buf(buf, chip); > > > else > > > use_bufpoi = 0; > > > > > > @@ -4009,9 +4013,7 @@ static int nand_do_write_ops(struct nand_chip *chip, loff_t to, > > > if (part_pagewr) > > > use_bufpoi = 1; > > > else if (chip->options & NAND_USE_BOUNCE_BUFFER) > > > - use_bufpoi = !virt_addr_valid(buf) || > > > - !IS_ALIGNED((unsigned long)buf, > > > - chip->buf_align); > > > + use_bufpoi = nand_need_bounce_buf(buf, chip); > > > else > > > use_bufpoi = 0; > > > > > > -- > > > 2.17.1 > > > > ______________________________________________________ Linux MTD discussion mailing list http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-mtd/