Re: [Bug] mtd: rawnand: gpmi

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 





On 10/09/2019 13.51, Sean Nyekjaer wrote:


On 10/09/2019 13.08, Sascha Hauer wrote:
On Tue, Sep 10, 2019 at 01:00:30PM +0200, Sean Nyekjaer wrote:


On 10/09/2019 12.48, Sascha Hauer wrote:
On Tue, Sep 10, 2019 at 12:18:25PM +0200, Sean Nyekjaer wrote:


On 10/09/2019 11.55, Sascha Hauer wrote:
[    2.434057] Bad block table written to 0x00001ffc0000, version 0x01 [    2.437254] Bad block table written to 0x00001ff80000, version 0x01
What about this "Bad block table written" message? You should see this exactly once. Do you see this multiple times, especially when switching
kernels between the good one and the bad one?

Sascha

Not exactly sure what you mean, but here is the dumps:

Before (mtd: rawnand: gpmi: Implement exec_op)
[    3.389352] Bad block table written to 0x00001ffc0000, version 0x01
[    3.399019] Bad block table written to 0x00001ff80000, version 0x01

After
[    3.301096] Bad block table written to 0x00001ffc0000, version 0x01
[    3.310599] Bad block table written to 0x00001ff80000, version 0x01

The Bad block table is written once. When you see this message multiple
times then this means that Linux can't read the BBT and writes it again.
So the question is: Start the good kernel multiple times. Do you see
this message once or on each boot? Then start the bad Kernel multiple
times. Do you see the message once or on each boot?

Sascha


U-boot:
=> nand erase.chip

NAND erase.chip: device 0 whole chip
Skipping bad block at  0x0c780000
Skipping bad block at  0x18000000
Skipping bad block at  0x18040000
Skipping bad block at  0x1ff00000
Skipping bad block at  0x1ff40000
Skipping bad block at  0x1ff80000
Skipping bad block at  0x1ffc0000

Look weird it marks the bbt location bad ?

Yes, that's normal. The BBT itself is marked as bad. Otherwise the they
would just be used by regular mtd users.

Or is it a uboot feature?
I have tried another board, and uboot marks the bbt location bad on that as
well

First boot:
[    4.149870] nand: device found, Manufacturer ID: 0x98, Chip ID: 0xdc


[    4.156589] nand: Toshiba NAND 512MiB 3,3V 8-bit
[    4.161500] nand: 512 MiB, SLC, erase size: 256 KiB, page size: 4096, OOB
size: 128

[    4.175918] Bad block table not found for chip 0
[    4.184059] Bad block table not found for chip 0
[    4.188808] Scanning device for bad blocks
[    4.690183] Bad eraseblock 798 at 0x00000c780000
[    5.155504] Bad eraseblock 1536 at 0x000018000000
[    5.161008] Bad eraseblock 1537 at 0x000018040000
[    5.487883] Bad block table written to 0x00001ffc0000, version 0x01

And is this the bad kernel or the good kernel? The question I am trying
to answer is: Can the good kernel read the BBT it has written? Can the
bad Kernel do that?

The "First boot" and "Second boot" was before the exec_op patch...

This is the new kernel including the exec_op patch:
[    1.343615] nand: device found, Manufacturer ID: 0x98, Chip ID: 0xdc

[    1.343656] nand: Toshiba NAND 512MiB 3,3V 8-bit

[    1.343693] nand: 512 MiB, SLC, erase size: 256 KiB, page size: 4096, OOB size: 128
[    1.348666] random: fast init done
[    1.349518] Bad block table not found for chip 0
[    1.351451] Bad block table not found for chip 0
[    1.351486] Scanning device for bad blocks
[    1.827337] Bad eraseblock 798 at 0x00000c780000

[    2.265949] Bad eraseblock 1536 at 0x000018000000
[    2.266318] Bad eraseblock 1537 at 0x000018040000

[    2.572820] Bad block table written to 0x00001ffc0000, version 0x01
[    2.576120] Bad block table written to 0x00001ff80000, version 0x01

[    2.577087] 3 fixed-partitions partitions found on MTD device gpmi-nand
[    2.577127] Creating 3 MTD partitions on "gpmi-nand":
[    2.577188] 0x000000000000-0x000000800000 : "boot"



[    2.584162] 0x000000800000-0x00001ca00000 : "ubi"
[    2.608571] 0x00001ca00000-0x000020000000 : "testing"
[    2.614136] gpmi-nand 1806000.gpmi-nand: driver registered.

Exactly the same output... which must mean it fails reading/writing the bbt on the 4.19.x series kernel.

/Sean

Hi Sascha

Please let me know when you have some time to look into this :-)
I dosen't seem right that it writes the bbt on a 4.19 series kernel twice

/Sean

______________________________________________________
Linux MTD discussion mailing list
http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-mtd/




[Index of Archives]     [LARTC]     [Bugtraq]     [Yosemite Forum]     [Photo]

  Powered by Linux