Hi,
On 2019/09/18 14:52, Greg KH wrote:
On Wed, Sep 18, 2019 at 07:32:39AM +0900, Tokunori Ikegami wrote:
On 2019/09/18 3:11, Greg KH wrote:
On Wed, Sep 18, 2019 at 02:50:48AM +0900, Tokunori Ikegami wrote:
As reported by the OpenWRT team, write requests sometimes fail on some
platforms.
Currently to check the state chip_ready() is used correctly as described by
the flash memory S29GL256P11TFI01 datasheet.
Also chip_good() is used to check if the write is succeeded and it was
implemented by the commit fb4a90bfcd6d8 ("[MTD] CFI-0002 - Improve error
checking").
But actually the write failure is caused on some platforms and also it can
be fixed by using chip_good() to check the state and retry instead.
Also it seems that it is caused after repeated about 1,000 times to retry
the write one word with the reset command.
By using chip_good() to check the state to be done it can be reduced the
retry with reset.
It is depended on the actual flash chip behavior so the root cause is
unknown.
Cc: Chris Packham <chris.packham@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Cc: Joakim Tjernlund <Joakim.Tjernlund@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
Cc: linux-mtd@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Cc: stable@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Reported-by: Fabio Bettoni <fbettoni@xxxxxxxxx>
Signed-off-by: Felix Fietkau <nbd@xxxxxxxx>
Signed-off-by: Hauke Mehrtens <hauke@xxxxxxxxxx>
Signed-off-by: Tokunori Ikegami <ikegami.t@xxxxxxxxx>
[vigneshr@xxxxxx: Fix a checkpatch warning]
Signed-off-by: Vignesh Raghavendra <vigneshr@xxxxxx>
---
drivers/mtd/chips/cfi_cmdset_0002.c | 18 ++++++++++++------
1 file changed, 12 insertions(+), 6 deletions(-)
mode change 100644 => 100755 drivers/mtd/chips/cfi_cmdset_0002.c
You changed the file to be executable??? That's not ok :(
Very sorry for this.
I missed it to fix to not be executable since it was changed to be
executable on my local environment.
Anyway I will do fix it.
Please do, we can not take these patches as-is at all.
I see.
Also, what is the git commit id of this patch in Linus's tree? I can't
seem to find it there.
Actually it has not been pulled in Linus's tree.
But it has been merged into
git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/mtd/linux.git mtd/next for
v5.4-rc1 as the git commit id 37c673ade35c.
So I thought as that it is okay to send the patches for the stable trees.
But should I wait to be pulled the patch in Linus's tree at first?
Yes, you have to wait, please read:
https://www.kernel.org/doc/html/latest/process/stable-kernel-rules.html
for how to do this properly.
Thank you for your advice.
I have just read the rule as described this so I will wait it to be
existed in Linus's tree.
Regards,
Ikegami
thanks,
greg k-h
______________________________________________________
Linux MTD discussion mailing list
http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-mtd/
