Re: linux-next: manual merge of the vfs tree with the ubifs tree

[Richard Weinberger <richard.weinberger@xxxxxxxxx>]

On Mon, Sep 16, 2019 at 3:40 PM Mark Brown <broonie@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>
> Hi all,
>
> Today's linux-next merge of the vfs tree got a conflict in:
>
>   fs/ubifs/super.c
>
> between commit:
>
>   9163e0184bd7d5f ("ubifs: Fix memory leak bug in alloc_ubifs_info() error path")
>
> from the ubifs tree and commit:
>
>   50d7aad57710e2b ("vfs: Convert ubifs to use the new mount API")
>
> from the vfs tree.
>
> I fixed it up dropping the ubifs change and can carry the fix as
> necessary. This is now fixed as far as linux-next is concerned, but any
> non trivial conflicts should be mentioned to your upstream maintainer
> when your tree is submitted for merging.  You may also want to consider
> cooperating with the maintainer of the conflicting tree to minimise any
> particularly complex conflicts.

Thanks a lot for letting me know!

-- 
Thanks,
//richard

______________________________________________________
Linux MTD discussion mailing list
http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-mtd/