Re: [RESEND PATCH v3 14/20] mtd: spi_nor: Add a ->setup() method

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Mon, 26 Aug 2019 13:38:48 +0000
Schrempf Frieder <frieder.schrempf@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:

> On 26.08.19 14:40, Boris Brezillon wrote:
> > On Mon, 26 Aug 2019 12:08:58 +0000
> > <Tudor.Ambarus@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> >   
> >> From: Tudor Ambarus <tudor.ambarus@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
> >>
> >> nor->params.setup() configures the SPI NOR memory. Useful for SPI NOR
> >> flashes that have peculiarities to the SPI NOR standard, e.g.
> >> different opcodes, specific address calculation, page size, etc.
> >> Right now the only user will be the S3AN chips, but other
> >> manufacturers can implement it if needed.
> >>
> >> Move spi_nor_setup() related code in order to avoid a forward
> >> declaration to spi_nor_default_setup().
> >>
> >> Reviewed-by: Boris Brezillon <boris.brezillon@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>  
> > 
> > Nitpick: R-bs should normally be placed after your SoB.  
> 
> Just a question unrelated to the patch content:
> 
> I learned to add R-b tags after my SoB when submitting MTD patches, but 
> recently I submitted a patch to the serial subsystem and was told to put 
> my SoB last. Is there an "official" rule for this? And if so where to 
> find it?

Should match the order of addition: if you picked an existing patch that
had already received R-b/A-b tags and applied it to your tree you
should add your SoB at the end. But if you are the author, your SoB
should come first. At least that's the rule I follow :-).

______________________________________________________
Linux MTD discussion mailing list
http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-mtd/



[Index of Archives]     [LARTC]     [Bugtraq]     [Yosemite Forum]     [Photo]

  Powered by Linux