On 08/25/2019 03:03 PM, Boris Brezillon wrote: > External E-Mail > > > On Sat, 24 Aug 2019 12:00:43 +0000 > <Tudor.Ambarus@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > >> From: Tudor Ambarus <tudor.ambarus@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> >> >> Add functions to delimit what the chunks of code do: >> >> static void spi_nor_init_params() >> { >> spi_nor_legacy_init_params() >> spi_nor_manufacturer_init_params() >> spi_nor_sfdp_init_params() >> } >> >> Add descriptions to all methods. >> >> spi_nor_init_params() becomes of type void, as all its children >> return void. >> >> Signed-off-by: Tudor Ambarus <tudor.ambarus@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> >> --- >> drivers/mtd/spi-nor/spi-nor.c | 83 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++----------- >> 1 file changed, 63 insertions(+), 20 deletions(-) >> >> diff --git a/drivers/mtd/spi-nor/spi-nor.c b/drivers/mtd/spi-nor/spi-nor.c >> index c9514dfd7d6d..93424f914159 100644 >> --- a/drivers/mtd/spi-nor/spi-nor.c >> +++ b/drivers/mtd/spi-nor/spi-nor.c >> @@ -4186,7 +4186,34 @@ static void spi_nor_manufacturer_init_params(struct spi_nor *nor) >> nor->info->fixups->default_init(nor); >> } >> >> -static int spi_nor_init_params(struct spi_nor *nor) >> +/** >> + * spi_nor_sfdp_init_params() - Initialize the flash's parameters and settings >> + * based on JESD216 SFDP standard. >> + * @nor: pointer to a 'struct spi-nor'. >> + * >> + * The method has a roll-back mechanism: in case the SFDP parsing fails, the >> + * legacy flash parameters and settings will be restored. >> + */ >> +static void spi_nor_sfdp_init_params(struct spi_nor *nor) >> +{ >> + struct spi_nor_flash_parameter sfdp_params; >> + >> + memcpy(&sfdp_params, &nor->params, sizeof(sfdp_params)); >> + >> + if (spi_nor_parse_sfdp(nor, &sfdp_params)) { >> + nor->addr_width = 0; >> + nor->flags &= ~SNOR_F_4B_OPCODES; >> + } else { >> + memcpy(&nor->params, &sfdp_params, sizeof(nor->params)); >> + } >> +} >> + >> +/** >> + * spi_nor_legacy_init_params() - Initialize the flash's parameters and settings >> + * based on nor->info data. >> + * @nor: pointer to a 'struct spi-nor'. >> + */ >> +static void spi_nor_legacy_init_params(struct spi_nor *nor) > > Nitpick: hm, I'm not a big fan of the 'legacy' term here as I'm not sure > it reflects the reality. I guess this function will stay around, and > even new NORs are not guaranteed to provide SFDP tables. How about > spi_nor_set_default_params() or spi_nor_info_init_params()? I can rename it to spi_nor_info_init_params() to be in sync with spi_nor_manufacturer_init_params() and spi_nor_sfdp_init_params() or I can rename all to: spi_nor_set_params() spi_nor_set_default_params() spi_nor_set_manufacturer_params() spi_nor_set_sfdp_params() Both are ok, but the second option seems better. What would you choose? > > That's just a suggestion, so here is my > > Reviewed-by: Boris Brezillon <boris.brezillon@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> > > in case you want to ignore it. > >> { >> struct spi_nor_flash_parameter *params = &nor->params; >> struct spi_nor_erase_map *map = ¶ms->erase_map; >> @@ -4260,25 +4287,43 @@ static int spi_nor_init_params(struct spi_nor *nor) >> spi_nor_set_erase_type(&map->erase_type[i], info->sector_size, >> SPINOR_OP_SE); >> spi_nor_init_uniform_erase_map(map, erase_mask, params->size); >> +} >> >> +/** >> + * spi_nor_init_params() - Initialize the flash's parameters and settings. >> + * @nor: pointer to a 'struct spi-nor'. >> + * >> + * The flash parameters and settings are initialized based on a sequence of >> + * calls that are ordered by priority: >> + * >> + * 1/ Legacy flash parameters initialization. The initializations are done >> + * based on nor->info data: >> + * spi_nor_legacy_init_params() >> + * >> + * which can be overwritten by: >> + * 2/ Manufacturer flash parameters initialization. The initializations are >> + * done based on MFR register, or when the decisions can not be done solely >> + * based on MFR, by using specific flash_info tweeks, ->default_init(): >> + * spi_nor_manufacturer_init_params() >> + * >> + * which can be overwritten by: >> + * 3/ SFDP flash parameters initialization. JESD216 SFDP is a standard and >> + * should be more accurate that the above. >> + * spi_nor_sfdp_init_params() >> + * >> + * Please not that there is a ->post_bfpt() fixup hook that can overwrite the >> + * flash parameters and settings imediately after parsing the Basic Flash >> + * Parameter Table. >> + */ >> +static void spi_nor_init_params(struct spi_nor *nor) >> +{ >> + spi_nor_legacy_init_params(nor); >> >> spi_nor_manufacturer_init_params(nor); >> >> - if ((info->flags & (SPI_NOR_DUAL_READ | SPI_NOR_QUAD_READ)) && >> - !(info->flags & SPI_NOR_SKIP_SFDP)) { >> - struct spi_nor_flash_parameter sfdp_params; >> - >> - memcpy(&sfdp_params, params, sizeof(sfdp_params)); >> - >> - if (spi_nor_parse_sfdp(nor, &sfdp_params)) { >> - nor->addr_width = 0; >> - nor->flags &= ~SNOR_F_4B_OPCODES; >> - } else { >> - memcpy(params, &sfdp_params, sizeof(*params)); >> - } >> - } >> - >> - return 0; >> + if ((nor->info->flags & (SPI_NOR_DUAL_READ | SPI_NOR_QUAD_READ)) && >> + !(nor->info->flags & SPI_NOR_SKIP_SFDP)) >> + spi_nor_sfdp_init_params(nor); >> } >> >> static int spi_nor_select_read(struct spi_nor *nor, >> @@ -4693,10 +4738,8 @@ int spi_nor_scan(struct spi_nor *nor, const char *name, >> nor->info->flags & SPI_NOR_HAS_LOCK) >> nor->params.disable_block_protection = spi_nor_clear_sr_bp; >> >> - /* Parse the Serial Flash Discoverable Parameters table. */ >> - ret = spi_nor_init_params(nor); >> - if (ret) >> - return ret; >> + /* Init flash parameters based on flash_info struct and SFDP */ >> + spi_nor_init_params(nor); >> >> if (!mtd->name) >> mtd->name = dev_name(dev); > > > ______________________________________________________ Linux MTD discussion mailing list http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-mtd/