On 8/15/19 3:27 PM, James Morris wrote:
On Thu, 15 Aug 2019, Mark Salyzyn wrote:
Good Idea, but using the same argument structure for set and get I would be
concerned about the loss of compiler protection for the buffer argument;
Agreed, I missed that.
Sadly, the pattern of
struct getxattr_args args;
memset(&args, 0, sizeof(args));
args.xxxx = ...
__vfs_getxattr(&args};
...
__vfs_setxattr(&args);
would be nice, so maybe we need to cool our jets and instead:
struct xattr_gs_args {
struct dentry *dentry;
struct inode *inode;
const char *name;
union {
void *buffer;
const void *value;
};
size_t size;
int flags;
};
value _must_ be referenced for all setxattr operations, buffer for getxattr operations (how can we enforce that?).
struct getxattr_args {
struct dentry *dentry;
struct inode *inode;
const char *name;
void *buffer;
size_t size;
int flags;
Does 'get' need flags?
:-) That was the _whole_ point of the patch, flags is how we pass in the
recursion so that a security/internal getxattr call has the rights to
acquire the data in the lower layer(s).
-- Mark
______________________________________________________
Linux MTD discussion mailing list
http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-mtd/
