Hi Ted, thanks for the review! On Sun, Jul 28, 2019 at 11:40:32AM -0400, Theodore Y. Ts'o wrote: > On Fri, Jul 26, 2019 at 03:41:30PM -0700, Eric Biggers wrote: > > From: Eric Biggers <ebiggers@xxxxxxxxxx> > > > > In preparation for introducing v2 encryption policies which will find > > and derive encryption keys differently from the current v1 encryption > > policies, refactor the v1 policy-specific key setup code from keyinfo.c > > into keysetup_legacy.c. Then rename keyinfo.c to keysetup.c. > > I'd use keysetup_v1.c, myself. We can hope that we've gotten it right > with v2 and we'll never need to do another version, but *something* is > going to come up eventually which will require a v3 keysetup , whether > it's post-quantuum cryptography or something else we can't anticipate > right now. > > For an example of the confusion that can result, one good example is > in the fs/quota subsystem, where QFMT_VFS_OLD, QFMT_VFS_V0, and > QFMT_VFS_V1 maps to quota_v1 and quota_v2 in an amusing and > non-obvious way. (Go ahead, try to guess before you go look at the > code. :-) > > Other than that, looks good. We can always move code around or rename > files in the future, so I'm not going to insist on doing it now (but > it would be my preference). > > Reviewed-by: Theodore Ts'o <tytso@xxxxxxx> > Agreed, I'll call it keysetup_v1.c instead. - Eric ______________________________________________________ Linux MTD discussion mailing list http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-mtd/