Re: [PATCH] mtd: rawnand: micron: handle "ecc off" devices correctly

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



Hi Miquel,

On 19-07-26 11:20, Miquel Raynal wrote:
> Wrong address for Boris again, sorry for the noise.
> 
> > Hi Lucas, Marco,
> > 
> > Lucas Stach <l.stach@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote on Fri, 26 Jul 2019 10:54:11
> > +0200:
> > 
> > > Hi Miguel,
> > > 
> > > Am Freitag, den 26.07.2019, 10:28 +0200 schrieb Miquel Raynal:  
> > > > Hi Marco,
> > > > 
> > > > + Richard
> > > > + Working e-mail address for Boris
> > > >     
> > > > > Marco Felsch <m.felsch@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote on Fri, 26 Jul 2019    
> > > > 09:44:34 +0200:
> > > >     
> > > > > Some devices don't support ecc "official". By "official" I mean that the  
> > 
> >                                  ^ uppercase ECC
> > 
> > > > > feature can be set trough the "SET FEATURE (EFh)" command but isn't
> > > > > reported to the "READ ID Parameter Tables". Because the "ECC Field"
> > > > > still says that it is disabled. This is applicable at least
> > > > > for the MT29F2G08ABAGA and MT29F2G08ABBGA devices. Even worse the
> > > > > datasheet describes the ECC feature in chapter "ECC Protection".  
> > 
> > What about:
> > 
> > "Some devices are supposed to do not support on-die ECC but
> > experience shows that internal ECC machinery can actually be enabled
> > through the "SET FEATURE (EFh)" command, even if a read of the "READ ID
> > Parameter Tables" returns that it is not."
> > 
> > > > > 
> > > > > Currently the driver checks the "READ ID Parameter" field directly after
> > > > > we enabled the feature. If the check fails we return immediately but
> > > > > leave the ECC on. Now all future read/program cycles goes trough the ecc
> > > > > and the host nfc gets confused and reports ECC errors.  
> > 
> > And here:
> > 
> > "Currently, the driver checks the "READ ID Parameter" field
> > directly after having enabled the feature. If the check fails it returns
> > immediately but leaves the ECC on. When using buggy chips like
> > MT29F2G08ABAGA and MT29F2G08ABBGA, all future read/program cycles will
> > go through the on-die ECC, confusing the host controller which is
> > supposed to be the one handling correction."
> > 
> > > > > To address this in a common way we need to turn off the ECC directly
> > > > > after reading the "READ ID Parameter" and before checking the
> > > > > "ECC status".
> > > > > 
> > > > > Signed-off-by: Marco Felsch <m.felsch@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>    
> > > > 
> > > > Good catch! However you report that on-die ECC correction is working
> > > > but you still disable it; any reason to do so ? Would it be better to
> > > > actually enable on-die ECC and explicitly mark these two chips as
> > > > buggy (see [1] for checking the chip IDs)?    
> > > 
> > > It's the other way around. The chip is not supposed to have on-die ECC
> > > according to the datasheet and correctly reflects this fact in the
> > > READ_ID, so Linux should not try to use the on-die ECC.  
> > 
> > Ok I understood the opposite because of the "Even worse the datasheet
> > describes the ECC feature [...]" which implied to me that the on-die ECC
> > feature was actually expected despite the status bit not being set.
> > 
> > Marco, can you rephrase a bit the commit log? I proposed something,
> > feel free to adapt.

Thanks for the fast reply :) Of course I can adapt it and adding Boris rb-tag.

Regards,
  Marco

> > > The bug is that the NAND is not supposed to have on-die ECC and reports
> > > this correctly, but then actually enables a on-die ECC unit when asked
> > > to, probably due to the same die being used for on-die ECC and ECC off
> > > devices. The consequence is that Linux (correctly) assumes that the
> > > full OOB size is available to the controller, but the on-die ECC unit
> > > scribbles over some of the OOB data.
> > > 
> > > I think this fix the most robust solution, as it makes sure to disable
> > > the on-die ECC unit to avoid the issue, which might also be present on
> > > other NAND chips we don't know about yet.
> > > 
> > > Regards,
> > > Lucas 
> > >   
> > > > [1] https://elixir.bootlin.com/linux/v5.3-rc1/source/drivers/mtd/nand/raw/nand_macronix.c#L83
> > > >     
> > > > > ---
> > > > >  drivers/mtd/nand/raw/nand_micron.c | 14 +++++++++++---
> > > > >  1 file changed, 11 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)
> > > > > 
> > > > > diff --git a/drivers/mtd/nand/raw/nand_micron.c b/drivers/mtd/nand/raw/nand_micron.c
> > > > > index 1622d3145587..fb199ad2f1a6 100644
> > > > > --- a/drivers/mtd/nand/raw/nand_micron.c
> > > > > +++ b/drivers/mtd/nand/raw/nand_micron.c
> > > > > @@ -390,6 +390,14 @@ static int micron_supports_on_die_ecc(struct nand_chip *chip)    
> > > > > > >  	    (chip->id.data[4] & MICRON_ID_INTERNAL_ECC_MASK) != 0x2)
> > > > > > >  		return MICRON_ON_DIE_UNSUPPORTED;    
> > > > >      
> > > > > > > +	/*
> > > > > > > +	 * It seems that there are devices which do not support ECC official.
> > > > > > > +	 * At least the MT29F2G08ABAGA / MT29F2G08ABBGA devices supports
> > > > > > > +	 * enabling the ECC feature but don't reflect that to the READ_ID table.
> > > > > > > +	 * So we have to guarantee that we disable the ECC feature directly
> > > > > > > +	 * after we did the READ_ID table command. Later we can evaluate the
> > > > > > > +	 * ECC_ENABLE support.
> > > > > > > +	 */
> > > > > > >  	ret = micron_nand_on_die_ecc_setup(chip, true);
> > > > > > >  	if (ret)
> > > > > > >  		return MICRON_ON_DIE_UNSUPPORTED;    
> > > > > @@ -398,13 +406,13 @@ static int micron_supports_on_die_ecc(struct nand_chip *chip)    
> > > > > > >  	if (ret)
> > > > > > >  		return MICRON_ON_DIE_UNSUPPORTED;    
> > > > >      
> > > > > > > -	if (!(id[4] & MICRON_ID_ECC_ENABLED))
> > > > > > > -		return MICRON_ON_DIE_UNSUPPORTED;    
> > > > > -    
> > > > > > >  	ret = micron_nand_on_die_ecc_setup(chip, false);
> > > > > > >  	if (ret)
> > > > > > >  		return MICRON_ON_DIE_UNSUPPORTED;    
> > > > >      
> > > > > > > +	if (!(id[4] & MICRON_ID_ECC_ENABLED))
> > > > > > > +		return MICRON_ON_DIE_UNSUPPORTED;    
> > > > > +    
> > > > > > >  	ret = nand_readid_op(chip, 0, id, sizeof(id));
> > > > > > >  	if (ret)    
> > > > >  		return MICRON_ON_DIE_UNSUPPORTED;    
> > > > 
> > > > Thanks,
> > > > Miquèl
> > > >     
> > 
> > 
> > Thanks,
> > Miquèl
> 
> 
> 
> 
> Thanks,
> Miquèl
> 

-- 
Pengutronix e.K.                           |                             |
Industrial Linux Solutions                 | http://www.pengutronix.de/  |
Peiner Str. 6-8, 31137 Hildesheim, Germany | Phone: +49-5121-206917-0    |
Amtsgericht Hildesheim, HRA 2686           | Fax:   +49-5121-206917-5555 |

______________________________________________________
Linux MTD discussion mailing list
http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-mtd/




[Index of Archives]     [LARTC]     [Bugtraq]     [Yosemite Forum]     [Photo]

  Powered by Linux