On Tue, 21 May 2019 08:59:48 +0200 Sascha Hauer <s.hauer@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > Hi, > > On Mon, Mar 04, 2019 at 09:15:21PM +0100, Miquel Raynal wrote: > > diff --git a/drivers/mtd/nand/raw/internals.h b/drivers/mtd/nand/raw/internals.h > > index fbf6ca015cd7..a204f9d7e123 100644 > > --- a/drivers/mtd/nand/raw/internals.h > > +++ b/drivers/mtd/nand/raw/internals.h > > @@ -110,7 +110,7 @@ static inline int nand_exec_op(struct nand_chip *chip, > > if (!nand_has_exec_op(chip)) > > return -ENOTSUPP; > > > > - if (WARN_ON(op->cs >= chip->numchips)) > > + if (WARN_ON(op->cs >= nanddev_ntargets(&chip->base))) > > return -EINVAL; > > This warning triggers when I apply my gpmi nand exec_op series. > > The gpmi driver calls: > > ret = nand_scan(chip, GPMI_IS_MX6(this) ? 2 : 1); > > This ends up in nand_scan_ident() with maxchips = 2. Here nand_detect() > is called which sets memorg->ntargets = 1; Later in nand_scan_ident() we > have: > > for (i = 1; i < maxchips; i++) { This loop should be fixed to test against nanddev_ntargets() instead of maxchips. > u8 id[2]; > > /* See comment in nand_get_flash_type for reset */ > ret = nand_reset(chip, i); > if (ret) > break; > .... > > this nand_reset() calls nand_exec_op() with op->cs = 1, nanddev_ntargets() = 1 > and boom. > > I can't see how this can work with anything else but maxchips = 1. Do you > have an idea how this is supposed to work? > > Sascha > > ______________________________________________________ Linux MTD discussion mailing list http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-mtd/