On Fri, 2019-05-10 at 14:01 +0300, Dan Carpenter wrote: > [External] > > > On Fri, May 10, 2019 at 09:13:26AM +0000, Ardelean, Alexandru wrote: > > On Wed, 2019-05-08 at 16:26 +0300, Alexandru Ardelean wrote: > > > On Wed, 2019-05-08 at 15:20 +0300, Dan Carpenter wrote: > > > > > > > > > > > > On Wed, May 08, 2019 at 02:28:35PM +0300, Alexandru Ardelean wrote: > > > > > -static const char * const phy_types[] = { > > > > > - "emmc 5.0 phy", > > > > > - "emmc 5.1 phy" > > > > > -}; > > > > > - > > > > > enum xenon_phy_type_enum { > > > > > EMMC_5_0_PHY, > > > > > EMMC_5_1_PHY, > > > > > NR_PHY_TYPES > > > > > > > > There is no need for NR_PHY_TYPES now so you could remove that as > > > > well. > > > > > > > > > > I thought the same. > > > The only reason to keep NR_PHY_TYPES, is for potential future > > > patches, > > > where it would be just 1 addition > > > > > > enum xenon_phy_type_enum { > > > EMMC_5_0_PHY, > > > EMMC_5_1_PHY, > > > + EMMC_5_2_PHY, > > > NR_PHY_TYPES > > > } > > > > > > Depending on style/preference of how to do enums (allow comma on last > > > enum > > > or not allow comma on last enum value), adding new enum values woudl > > > be 2 > > > additions + 1 deletion lines. > > > > > > enum xenon_phy_type_enum { > > > EMMC_5_0_PHY, > > > - EMMC_5_1_PHY > > > + EMM > > > C_5_1_PHY, > > > + EMMC_5_2_PHY > > > } > > > > > > Either way (leave NR_PHY_TYPES or remove NR_PHY_TYPES) is fine from > > > my > > > side. > > > > > > > Preference on this ? > > If no objection [nobody insists] I would keep. > > > > I don't feel strongly about it [dropping NR_PHY_TYPES or not]. > > If you end up resending the series could you remove it, but if not then > it's not worth it. ack thanks Alex > > regards, > dan carpenter > ______________________________________________________ Linux MTD discussion mailing list http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-mtd/