Re: [PATCH 1/2] ubifs: Remove #ifdef around CONFIG_FS_ENCRYPTION

[Richard Weinberger <richard@xxxxxx>]

Eric,

----- Ursprüngliche Mail -----
> Von: "Eric Biggers" <ebiggers@xxxxxxxxxx>
> An: "Sascha Hauer" <s.hauer@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>, "richard" <richard@xxxxxx>
> CC: "linux-mtd" <linux-mtd@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>, linux-fscrypt@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx, "tytso" <tytso@xxxxxxx>, "kernel"
> <kernel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
> Gesendet: Mittwoch, 8. Mai 2019 05:19:55
> Betreff: Re: [PATCH 1/2] ubifs: Remove #ifdef around CONFIG_FS_ENCRYPTION

> On Tue, Mar 26, 2019 at 08:52:31AM +0100, Sascha Hauer wrote:
>> ifdefs reduce readablity and compile coverage. This removes the ifdefs
>> around CONFIG_FS_ENCRYPTION by using IS_ENABLED and relying on static
>> inline wrappers. A new static inline wrapper for setting sb->s_cop is
>> introduced to allow filesystems to unconditionally compile in their
>> s_cop operations.
>> 
>> Signed-off-by: Sascha Hauer <s.hauer@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
>> ---
>>  fs/ubifs/ioctl.c        | 11 +----------
>>  fs/ubifs/sb.c           |  7 ++++---
>>  fs/ubifs/super.c        |  4 +---
>>  include/linux/fscrypt.h | 11 +++++++++++
>>  4 files changed, 17 insertions(+), 16 deletions(-)
>> 
>> diff --git a/fs/ubifs/ioctl.c b/fs/ubifs/ioctl.c
>> index 82e4e6a30b04..6b05b3ec500e 100644
>> --- a/fs/ubifs/ioctl.c
>> +++ b/fs/ubifs/ioctl.c
>> @@ -193,7 +193,6 @@ long ubifs_ioctl(struct file *file, unsigned int cmd,
>> unsigned long arg)
>>  		return err;
>>  	}
>>  	case FS_IOC_SET_ENCRYPTION_POLICY: {
>> -#ifdef CONFIG_FS_ENCRYPTION
>>  		struct ubifs_info *c = inode->i_sb->s_fs_info;
>>  
>>  		err = ubifs_enable_encryption(c);
>> @@ -201,17 +200,9 @@ long ubifs_ioctl(struct file *file, unsigned int cmd,
>> unsigned long arg)
>>  			return err;
>>  
>>  		return fscrypt_ioctl_set_policy(file, (const void __user *)arg);
>> -#else
>> -		return -EOPNOTSUPP;
>> -#endif
>>  	}
>> -	case FS_IOC_GET_ENCRYPTION_POLICY: {
>> -#ifdef CONFIG_FS_ENCRYPTION
>> +	case FS_IOC_GET_ENCRYPTION_POLICY:
>>  		return fscrypt_ioctl_get_policy(file, (void __user *)arg);
>> -#else
>> -		return -EOPNOTSUPP;
>> -#endif
>> -	}
>>  
>>  	default:
>>  		return -ENOTTY;
>> diff --git a/fs/ubifs/sb.c b/fs/ubifs/sb.c
>> index 67fac1e8adfb..2afc8b1d4c3b 100644
>> --- a/fs/ubifs/sb.c
>> +++ b/fs/ubifs/sb.c
>> @@ -748,14 +748,12 @@ int ubifs_read_superblock(struct ubifs_info *c)
>>  		goto out;
>>  	}
>>  
>> -#ifndef CONFIG_FS_ENCRYPTION
>> -	if (c->encrypted) {
>> +	if (!IS_ENABLED(CONFIG_UBIFS_FS_ENCRYPTION) && c->encrypted) {
>>  		ubifs_err(c, "file system contains encrypted files but UBIFS"
>>  			     " was built without crypto support.");
>>  		err = -EINVAL;
>>  		goto out;
>>  	}
> 
> A bit late, but I noticed this in ubifs/linux-next.  This needs to use
> CONFIG_FS_ENCRYPTION here, not CONFIG_UBIFS_FS_ENCRYPTION, as the latter no
> longer exists.

Thanks for spotting. I'll fit it myself in -next.

Thanks,
//richard

______________________________________________________
Linux MTD discussion mailing list
http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-mtd/