On Fri, May 3, 2019 at 10:14 PM Clayton Shotwell <clayton.shotwell@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > > Need to ensure the underlying flash does not cache anything even though > the file system thinks it's synced back. > > Signed-off-by: Clayton Shotwell <clayton.shotwell@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> > --- > fs/jffs2/super.c | 1 + > 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+) > > diff --git a/fs/jffs2/super.c b/fs/jffs2/super.c > index 05d892c..4341565 100644 > --- a/fs/jffs2/super.c > +++ b/fs/jffs2/super.c > @@ -111,6 +111,7 @@ static int jffs2_sync_fs(struct super_block *sb, int wait) > mutex_lock(&c->alloc_sem); > jffs2_flush_wbuf_pad(c); > mutex_unlock(&c->alloc_sem); > + mtd_sync(c->mtd); This needs a more detailed explanation. mtd_sync() is not cheap, so you make syncfs() more expensive. Please explain what failure you are facing without mtd_sync(). jffs2 is supposed to recover from a power failure at any time, just like ubifs. -- Thanks, //richard ______________________________________________________ Linux MTD discussion mailing list http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-mtd/