Hi Boris, Boris Brezillon <boris.brezillon@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote on Sun, 31 Mar 2019 13:30:01 +0200: > On Mon, 4 Mar 2019 23:28:11 +0100 > Miquel Raynal <miquel.raynal@xxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > > > Prepare the migration to a generic ECC engine by renaming the > > nand_ecc_req structure into nand_ecc_conf. This structure will be the > > base of a wider 'nand_ecc' structure. > > > > Signed-off-by: Miquel Raynal <miquel.raynal@xxxxxxxxxxx> > > --- > > include/linux/mtd/nand.h | 8 ++++---- > > include/linux/mtd/spinand.h | 2 +- > > 2 files changed, 5 insertions(+), 5 deletions(-) > > > > diff --git a/include/linux/mtd/nand.h b/include/linux/mtd/nand.h > > index 84ab76f34c74..78cf905083c9 100644 > > --- a/include/linux/mtd/nand.h > > +++ b/include/linux/mtd/nand.h > > @@ -123,11 +123,11 @@ struct nand_page_io_req { > > }; > > > > /** > > - * struct nand_ecc_req - NAND ECC requirements > > + * struct nand_ecc_conf - NAND ECC configuration > > Maybe nand_ecc_info, nand_ecc_caps or nand_ecc_props would be more > appropriate as _conf seems to imply you can change it, which is not > the case when you use this struct to express chip requirements or when > you use an on-die ECC which is not configurable. nand_ecc_props sounds good to me! Thanks, Miquèl ______________________________________________________ Linux MTD discussion mailing list http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-mtd/